Good rod specs for small streams, native brookies

I will say, I had a similar experience on one outing with a Maxcatch glass rod, where a ton of fish were coming unbuttoned. It felt like the tip wasn’t sensitive enough to keep tension while I was stripping line in. I would have to imagine that there is some degree of build/material quality which influences that aspect of a rod.

I’ve fished lots of other glass rods, some very slow action (bend deep into the blank), but they still felt responsive enough at the tip to register and react to the movements of a thrashing fish and keep tension.
 
I'm old, so this might not matter much. Anyhow, I use a 6 1/2-foot, 4-wt, when I am targeting brookies, which I don't get to do much anymore. It is a nice small-stream rod with a moderately quick action, though if I were buying another one, I would get the same length but try a 3-wt. Mine is an old rod: an Orvis Rocky Mountain rod, one of Orvis's less expensive rods when I bought it.

I like to fish for brook trout with dry flies even if there is no obvious surface action.
 
Couple thoughts/questions.
Are the fish really only 2-3"?

What size fly were you using? For fish this small I'd guess if you're using anything bigger than an 18 they might not be getting it all in their mouth and maybe that's why you didn't hook up solidly - a 2" brookie is like a minnow.

Second I'm not sure any rod is really sensitive enough to feel a 2-3" fish take, heck some/most times we don't even feel a 10" fish take. Most of my brookie fishing is with dries so I see it rather than feel.

Third if the stream I'm on only has 3" brookies I'd be looking elsewhere.

Also I have a 7'3" Steffen glass rod and a 7' Orvis bamboo I like a lot for that type fishing. I keep smacking limbs with longer rods like 8'ers.
 
For places like this: Shaw Run, Blair Co, June

(which is a smallish, mtn freestone stream, populated mostly with brookies)

1000002660.jpg


I use 'this':

1000002661.jpg


...which is a 7'0 5wt cane rod. It is a m/71, which is a Montgomery Wards ("Sportking") label of the Horrocks & Ibbottson Tonka Prince, made in the 1940s-early 1950s. It weighs 4.1 oz. They aren't impossible to find, but modern glass and cane makers can set you up with something very similar, depending on your budget. If you are handy and into DIY, you could save some $ building it yourself from components (blank, guides, grip, etc.) .I find it has a 'faster' action for cane, but still slower than modern carbon. Lots of opinions; yes, and here is mine: I favor cane and glass, no more than 7'6" in the above situation. The heavier line loads these shorter sticks quick: and these rods, with a little practice, will send your fly where you want it to be, in tight quarters.

Joe
 
It was the 6'6" rod I was fishing with. Even though a shorter rod seems better for tighter streams, it felt too short in a way. I had to have to have a lot of fly line out to reach any pocket without standing right over top of it, and ever time I'd start stripping the line in to land a brookie, they'd pop off, regardless of how solidly it felt like they were hooked. I was going to go for a 7ft, but maybe I'll go for a 7.5 ft.
Sleepy, I didn't see that you related the length of your leader. For a short rod, I've found that it should be no more than a foot longer than the rod length. At least that's what I've seen recommended and it works better for me.
 
Sleepy, I didn't see that you related the length of your leader. For a short rod, I've found that it should be no more than a foot longer than the rod length. At least that's what I've seen recommended and it works better for me.
That might have been part of my issue. I only have typical 9ft premade leaders, which seems a little long for a 6'6" rod. Would it still be too long for a 7.5 footer?

I'm old, so this might not matter much. Anyhow, I use a 6 1/2-foot, 4-wt, when I am targeting brookies, which I don't get to do much anymore. It is a nice small-stream rod with a moderately quick action, though if I were buying another one, I would get the same length but try a 3-wt. Mine is an old rod: an Orvis Rocky Mountain rod, one of Orvis's less expensive rods when I bought it.

I like to fish for brook trout with dry flies even if there is no obvious surface action.
I did try some dry flies on that fateful day that the brookies shamed me, but honestly I had a really tough time actually seeing the dry fly against the glare of the water, with and without polarized glasses. I think that is something I may need practice with.

Couple thoughts/questions.
Are the fish really only 2-3"?

What size fly were you using? For fish this small I'd guess if you're using anything bigger than an 18 they might not be getting it all in their mouth and maybe that's why you didn't hook up solidly - a 2" brookie is like a minnow.

Second I'm not sure any rod is really sensitive enough to feel a 2-3" fish take, heck some/most times we don't even feel a 10" fish take. Most of my brookie fishing is with dries so I see it rather than feel.

Third if the stream I'm on only has 3" brookies I'd be looking elsewhere.

Also I have a 7'3" Steffen glass rod and a 7' Orvis bamboo I like a lot for that type fishing. I keep smacking limbs with longer rods like 8'ers.
I was mostly using nymphs size #14 and smaller. Often the brookies chose to attack my brightly colored indicator instead v.v I haven't had the pleasure of fishing any place with *big* brookies. Just small wild streams. I think the biggest brookie I've ever caught couldn't have been more than 5-6 inches, and most of them have been 3-4". That being said, I can catch them pretty readily on little JDM spoons, and I can certainly feel them fight on my UL spinning set up (you can feel a minnow fight on the Daiwa presso). In my heart I want something that sensitive, but I don't think it really exists in fly rods.
 
Back
Top