Good rod specs for small streams, native brookies

[nd1001]

I will say, I had a similar experience on one outing with a Maxcatch glass rod, where a ton of fish were coming unbuttoned. It felt like the tip wasn’t sensitive enough to keep tension while I was stripping line in. I would have to imagine that there is some degree of build/material quality which influences that aspect of a rod.

I’ve fished lots of other glass rods, some very slow action (bend deep into the blank), but they still felt responsive enough at the tip to register and react to the movements of a thrashing fish and keep tension.

 

[wildtrout2]

I fish a 7' 3wt exclusively on small mountain freestone streams. Perfect rod for the job.

 

[falcon]

I dont fish small water often. I like to use a 7ft 4in Thomas and Thomas Lotic, a glass rod. I like to use this rod on the Upper Willowemoc.

 

[Nocktavius]

Any fly rod shorter than 7 feet is nothin but a toy. Unless you’re serious about a commitment to small streams I’d probably just take whatever 8.5” 4 or 5 wt you use for general use out there. You’ll appreciate the extra reach and ability to keep your line off the water after you modify (shorten) your leader to do what you need it to do.

There’s a story out there somewhere about Humphreys and Harvey fishing together on a small brookie stream where ole George out fished Joe bc he had an 8’ rod.

 

[rrt]

I'm old, so this might not matter much. Anyhow, I use a 6 1/2-foot, 4-wt, when I am targeting brookies, which I don't get to do much anymore. It is a nice small-stream rod with a moderately quick action, though if I were buying another one, I would get the same length but try a 3-wt. Mine is an old rod: an Orvis Rocky Mountain rod, one of Orvis's less expensive rods when I bought it.

I like to fish for brook trout with dry flies even if there is no obvious surface action.

 

[wildtrout2]

I like to fish for brook trout with dry flies even if there is no obvious surface action.

I've noticed that to be the case more often than not on brookie streams. I fish a dry more than anything else. Love the visual aspect of fishing dries.

 

[kbobb]

Couple thoughts/questions.
Are the fish really only 2-3"?

What size fly were you using? For fish this small I'd guess if you're using anything bigger than an 18 they might not be getting it all in their mouth and maybe that's why you didn't hook up solidly - a 2" brookie is like a minnow.

Second I'm not sure any rod is really sensitive enough to feel a 2-3" fish take, heck some/most times we don't even feel a 10" fish take. Most of my brookie fishing is with dries so I see it rather than feel.

Third if the stream I'm on only has 3" brookies I'd be looking elsewhere.

Also I have a 7'3" Steffen glass rod and a 7' Orvis bamboo I like a lot for that type fishing. I keep smacking limbs with longer rods like 8'ers.

 

[CinnamonJoe]

For places like this: Shaw Run, Blair Co, June

(which is a smallish, mtn freestone stream, populated mostly with brookies)

I use 'this':

...which is a 7'0 5wt cane rod. It is a m/71, which is a Montgomery Wards ("Sportking") label of the Horrocks & Ibbottson Tonka Prince, made in the 1940s-early 1950s. It weighs 4.1 oz. They aren't impossible to find, but modern glass and cane makers can set you up with something very similar, depending on your budget. If you are handy and into DIY, you could save some $ building it yourself from components (blank, guides, grip, etc.) .I find it has a 'faster' action for cane, but still slower than modern carbon. Lots of opinions; yes, and here is mine: I favor cane and glass, no more than 7'6" in the above situation. The heavier line loads these shorter sticks quick: and these rods, with a little practice, will send your fly where you want it to be, in tight quarters.

Joe