Zak wrote:
I would LOVE to hear what the surveyed biomass was for BE Creek in Clinton. That is BIG water there. More like a small river. You would think that if there was a class A trout pop in there it wouldn't be a secret.
Mike wrote:
Streams on the list are designated by the county of the mouth, NOT necessarily the county where the candidate Class A section is located.
Read the first column"s header on the candidate list provided by the op.
sarce wrote:
Maybe they meant to add the section below Spring Creek? Which I also never fished, so idk what that population is like either
Is there a specific reason why they want to designate unnamed tributaries as Class "A" streams? Environmental protection?
tomitrout wrote:
Is there a specific reason why they want to designate unnamed tributaries as Class "A" streams? Environmental protection?
Yes, getting streams listed as either Wild Trout or Class A designated waters then allows them further protections as either cold water fisheries or possibly upgraded to exceptional value streams which grants these waters many more protections than if they're just left on the books as some unnamed tributary.