Data Center along Swatara Creek

OMG I can't remember which one, but I do remember firewire. I think you're too young for SCSI ?

Please, my first hard drive was a proper 5.25" full height MFM, but you could format 'em RLL and squeeze an extra 20% out of them or something. It was 20 megabytes. Mega, not giga. That still blows my mind to put into perspective.

I've also had ESDI drives. SCSI1, SCSI2, and Ultra SCSI. Also, unlike Apple folks, I know it's pronounced "scuzzy" and not "sexy" no matter what they tried to tell you. 🙂 DC2120 tapes. DAT tapes. DLT tapes. God, does anyone still use tapes?

I also owned a couple of NeXTstations for several years. Go ahead, I know you're a little jealous. We used them at work because they were cheaper than 21" monitors.

BUt, on topic:

I think the heavy pivot is ti seems like easy money, and people are going to use them. Computing grows exponentially every day, and there's been a massive rush to offload everything into "the cloud."

That includes hyperscale blade servers that pack more compute into smaller spaces than ever before. It's not only more efficient, but it's better. Very few big physical boxes that do one thing exist anymore, now everything is mostly virtualized and lives on a software simulation of a computer that can simply be moved to another host. The host are giant storage arrays built by packing 300-600 hard drives into a cabinet. One fails, it doesn';t matter as they others carry the load and you replace the dead soldier. Blade servers work the same way. If a component dies, you yank out that blade and slap a new one in. Hot spares keep the whole thing moving right along.

All of that stuff needs to go somewhere. And again, I ask you, where would you like it to go? Who would you like to safeguard your data, American countries or other "allied" European countries where we trust them to have some semblence of physical security or some random place in India where you don't know who actually has access and if anyone watching the door cares. Or, perhaps you feel we should just offload it to Africa, I mean, plenty of spac,e right, probably happy to get money for their economy and local warlords who I am sure are going to be happy to keep thsoe facilities running. Or, again, the PRC. I mean, no danger there, right?

Its gotta go somewhere. Decide where you want it. "No!" is not an option.
 
Please, my first hard drive was a proper 5.25" full height MFM, but you could format 'em RLL and squeeze an extra 20% out of them or something. It was 20 megabytes. Mega, not giga. That still blows my mind to put into perspective.

I've also had ESDI drives. SCSI1, SCSI2, and Ultra SCSI. Also, unlike Apple folks, I know it's pronounced "scuzzy" and not "sexy" no matter what they tried to tell you. 🙂 DC2120 tapes. DAT tapes. DLT tapes. God, does anyone still use tapes?

I also owned a couple of NeXTstations for several years. Go ahead, I know you're a little jealous. We used them at work because they were cheaper than 21" monitors.

BUt, on topic:

I think the heavy pivot is ti seems like easy money, and people are going to use them. Computing grows exponentially every day, and there's been a massive rush to offload everything into "the cloud."

That includes hyperscale blade servers that pack more compute into smaller spaces than ever before. It's not only more efficient, but it's better. Very few big physical boxes that do one thing exist anymore, now everything is mostly virtualized and lives on a software simulation of a computer that can simply be moved to another host. The host are giant storage arrays built by packing 300-600 hard drives into a cabinet. One fails, it doesn';t matter as they others carry the load and you replace the dead soldier. Blade servers work the same way. If a component dies, you yank out that blade and slap a new one in. Hot spares keep the whole thing moving right along.

All of that stuff needs to go somewhere. And again, I ask you, where would you like it to go? Who would you like to safeguard your data, American countries or other "allied" European countries where we trust them to have some semblence of physical security or some random place in India where you don't know who actually has access and if anyone watching the door cares. Or, perhaps you feel we should just offload it to Africa, I mean, plenty of spac,e right, probably happy to get money for their economy and local warlords who I am sure are going to be happy to keep thsoe facilities running. Or, again, the PRC. I mean, no danger there, right?

Its gotta go somewhere. Decide where you want it. "No!" is not an option.
It doesn't need to go anywhere. It's not needed or wanted. We as a society have enough. We live in incredible excess. We don't need more. More isn't better. As a whole, while adding some positive to society, this crazy lightning speed has been a net negative on our society, on our physical and mental health. We are not better as a result.
 
It doesn't need to go anywhere. It's not needed or wanted. We as a society have enough. We live in incredible excess. We don't need more. More isn't better. As a whole, while adding some positive to society, this crazy lightning speed has been a net negative on our society, on our physical and mental health. We are not better as a result.

That's great but it's not going to happen. It never has. It never will. Unless some apocalyptic scenario wipes us out your answer is invalid.

Again, it's gotta go somewhere. Decide where. "No!" is not an option.
 
It doesn't need to go anywhere. It's not needed or wanted. We as a society have enough. We live in incredible excess. We don't need more. More isn't better. As a whole, while adding some positive to society, this crazy lightning speed has been a net negative on our society, on our physical and mental health. We are not better as a result.
Spoken like someone who has no idea what AI is capable of. It is needed and wanted. If you saw what it is capable of doing in terms of “real world” applications you might have a different opinion. It is an incredible game changer.
 
Spoken like someone who has no idea what AI is capable of. It is needed and wanted. If you saw what it is capable of doing in terms of “real world” applications you might have a different opinion. It is an incredible game changer.Let
Actually I can say the same thing about you. That you don't know what's it's capable of. You assume that what it's capable of is good. You assume the people controlling it and building it are doing so for the common good...that's a huge assumption. You assume no negative affect on society, or our environment.
If you asked AI 20 years from now, I wonder if AI would say these data centers are good for our society and environment.
 
That's great but it's not going to happen. It never has. It never will. Unless some apocalyptic scenario wipes us out your answer is invalid.

Again, it's gotta go somewhere. Decide where. "No!" is not an op
Actually NO is an option. Hey, food for thought...AI just might be that apocalyptic scenario you speak of. Anyway, I'm off to tend the garden, take a walk with my dog. I've had enough of technology for the day.
 
I absolutely hate the idea of large data centers, but they are a necessary evil and a sign of the times. This AI has a looong way to go yet, so hold onto your seats. When I use ChatGPT, it makes me aware of the need for data centers. The amount of accurate, detailed information it provides is mind boggling! I use it many times a day.
I still don't want a data center in MY neighborhood. 😆
 
Actually NO is an option. Hey, food for thought...AI just might be that apocalyptic scenario you speak of. Anyway, I'm off to tend the garden, take a walk with my dog. I've had enough of technology for the day.

Did you enjoy "If Anyone Builds It Everyone Dies?" If not, go ahead and read it. Right up your alley.

And again, "no" is not an option. It wasn't in the industrial revolution. It was when transistors came along. Or computers. And it won't be now.

But you know, for all your generalized hatred you're enjoying this forum. Probably on a phone or a computer. And you probably make calls, send text messages, use a doctor, buy gardening supplies from Amazon, take your dog to the vet, and everything else that modern life has brought you.

"No" is not an option.

And you partake in that hypocrisy every single day.
 
Did you enjoy "If Anyone Builds It Everyone Dies?" If not, go ahead and read it. Right up your alley.

And again, "no" is not an option. It wasn't in the industrial revolution. It was when transistors came along. Or computers. And it won't be now.

But you know, for all your generalized hatred you're enjoying this forum. Probably on a phone or a computer. And you probably make calls, send text messages, use a doctor, buy gardening supplies from Amazon, take your dog to the vet, and everything else that modern life has brought you.

"No" is not an option.

And you partake in that hypocrisy every single day.
So you got generalized hatred and hypocrisy from an honest open discussion? Not sure how you got to that from just an honest opinion. We can go that route if you want. But maybe someone like you needs AI to help you actually think for yourself.

Seems some people defend AI as much as they defend artificial trout. Wonder what AI would say about stocking over wild trout.

Hey, no hard feelings. Open debate and discussion is the foundation of our society. We can still be friends, fish together. We can both have our own opinion, well at least until AI gets going and tells us all what to think.
 
Last edited:
Spoken like someone who has no idea what AI is capable of. It is needed and wanted. If you saw what it is capable of doing in terms of “real world” applications you might have a different opinion. It is an incredible game changer.
Ill be impressed when it starts actually giving correct answers to my search inquiries that are forced to me at the top of the results. So far it's wrong most of the time.
 
So you got generalized hatred and hypocrisy from an honest open discussion? Not sure how you got to that from just an honest opinion. We can go that route if you want. But maybe someone like you needs AI to help you actually think for yourself.

You are seething with generalized hate about "AI" and computing, yes. It didn't take much to infer that, no. If that's not the correct read you should ask ChatGPT how to format your posts to come across as more open minded.
 
Ill be impressed when it starts actually giving correct answers to my search inquiries that are forced to me at the top of the results. So far it's wrong most of the time.

The key is picking the right LLM and asking the right questions.

You'd be surprised at how far it can take things. ChatGPT is fantastic at producing images, actually. But you gotta be careful how you ask for things or you will end up for rip offs. Also the "basic" tier free model just usually devolves into giving you lists. Make sure you ask it for "realistic answers" and to not glow you up.

Gemini is great for current events. It's great for having a quick precis done of a current event without having to dig through a thousand heavily biased websites, you just get one distilled down. Same thing about realistic answers and not glowing you up. Gemini's safety filters are overtuned.

Grok.. I never use it.

Claude is surprisingly well adapted to working in your typing style. It's disturbing how you start to feel like having a conversation. I use it constantly to help break things down. I hand it a manual, ask it to read it and spit back interesting things and it's consistently pointed the right stuff out. I can then ask it how to do things and it just spits it out without effort. I'd literally love to share a perfect conversation. In three questions it gave me the proper breakdown of which divisions would never fire at the same time, then had it modify to allow the most drift of the various points while still favouring not firing, then the exact times each division took while it handed me back the number of minutes, or hours, between those splits.

No one's doing that math in their head. It took about 10 seconds for each.

But ask it "where should I go fshing?" Or "What flies do I use for Swatara Creek in July?" and it will be forced to give you ****** answered based on the information distilled from a thousand other creeks in July.

Instead, ask it to search for that answer. It will hand all those web results, distilled down to just what you need, in 15 seconds.

That said, Claude will only glow you up. In Claude's eyes you can do no wrong.
 
Ill be impressed when it starts actually giving correct answers to my search inquiries that are forced to me at the top of the results. So far it's wrong most of the time.
At first I thought you were just being funny. But now maybe you are serious. In that case, You get what you pay for (nothing) or what others have payed for (the inaccurate results at the top). Just get used to skimming over the payed for ads to find the real results your wanted.
 
The key is picking the right LLM and asking the right questions.

You'd be surprised at how far it can take things. ChatGPT is fantastic at producing images, actually. But you gotta be careful how you ask for things or you will end up for rip offs. Also the "basic" tier free model just usually devolves into giving you lists. Make sure you ask it for "realistic answers" and to not glow you up.

Gemini is great for current events. It's great for having a quick precis done of a current event without having to dig through a thousand heavily biased websites, you just get one distilled down. Same thing about realistic answers and not glowing you up. Gemini's safety filters are overtuned.

Grok.. I never use it.

Claude is surprisingly well adapted to working in your typing style. It's disturbing how you start to feel like having a conversation. I use it constantly to help break things down. I hand it a manual, ask it to read it and spit back interesting things and it's consistently pointed the right stuff out. I can then ask it how to do things and it just spits it out without effort. I'd literally love to share a perfect conversation. In three questions it gave me the proper breakdown of which divisions would never fire at the same time, then had it modify to allow the most drift of the various points while still favouring not firing, then the exact times each division took while it handed me back the number of minutes, or hours, between those splits.

No one's doing that math in their head. It took about 10 seconds for each.

But ask it "where should I go fshing?" Or "What flies do I use for Swatara Creek in July?" and it will be forced to give you ****** answered based on the information distilled from a thousand other creeks in July.

Instead, ask it to search for that answer. It will hand all those web results, distilled down to just what you need, in 15 seconds.

That said, Claude will only glow you up. In Claude's eyes you can do no wrong.
I'm sure ill get there at some point, but it really serves me no purpose at this time. I'm not against it in general, and I agree with your assessment that it's a train without a brake at this point.
 
Warehouses, data centers, Give them tax break handouts.More impervious surfaces , crazy rainfall rates overwhelming runoff ditches. Raise taxes on property owners. Makes perfect sense but maybe ask AI.
Do we really NEED big data centers? Or is it just a want of some? Food, water,clothes, oxygen, and shelter are needs. AI? Wouldn't that be a want? Seems like using water and polluting the air takes away from needs. But what do I know. Ask AI.
I'm not against AI, just maybe put them in one of the $***hole states like Alabama or Mississippi maybe. Louisiana maybe.
 
At first I thought you were just being funny. But now maybe you are serious. In that case, You get what you pay for (nothing) or what others have payed for (the inaccurate results at the top). Just get used to skimming over the payed for ads to find the real results your wanted.
Like I said in my other post, it serves me no purpose at this point, so I skip it and look thr old fashioned way. When my job requires it (probably wont), ill get into it
 
Warehouses, data centers, Give them tax break handouts.More impervious surfaces , crazy rainfall rates overwhelming runoff ditches. Raise taxes on property owners. Makes perfect sense but maybe ask AI.
Do we really NEED big data centers? Or is it just a want of some? Food, water,clothes, oxygen, and shelter are needs. AI? Wouldn't that be a want? Seems like using water and polluting the air takes away from needs. But what do I know. Ask AI.
I'm not against AI, just maybe put them in one of the $***hole states like Alabama or Mississippi maybe. Louisiana maybe.
500 acres with 75% impervious was what
I heard at The meeting tonight.
 
Back
Top