Big Springs

[Paul6.5]

I only discovered Big Spring Creek a few years ago, and it’s been an intriguing stream for me ever since. It’s one of the few places I have fished that has a good population of wild rainbows, and spotting a few fish in the 18-inch-plus range certainly keeps me coming back.

I headed over the other day because I’m still recovering from quadriceps tendon repair surgery back in May, and the creek offers some relatively easy wading. After a couple hours of catching my usual 4"–9" wild rainbows, I pulled out my camp chair and enjoyed a hoagie and a cigar before heading home.

While I was sitting there, a local fellow came over and started telling me how much worse the creek has been since the restoration. I mostly listened and offered a few “Oh yeah?” and “That’s too bad” responses. I didn’t want to argue, especially since I never fished it before the work was done and had nothing to compare it with.

But the conversation left me curious. To my untrained eyes, the creek looks healthy, and I’ve enjoyed the fishing. I also realize that catching fish doesn’t tell the whole story.

For those who knew Big Spring before the restoration, do you think it’s worse off today? If so, in what ways—habitat, insect life, trout numbers or size, or something else?

I’m asking sincerely. I’ve only gotten to know the creek as it is now, and I’d be interested in hearing from people who have a longer history with it.

 

[dudemanspecial]

I've never fished it, always wanted to, but I feel like I have to say that you are the first person I have ever heard, both on this forum and in person, that had a positve tone when talking about fishing it.

 

[redietz]

I've never fished it, always wanted to, but I feel like I have to say that you are the first person I have ever heard, both on this forum and in person, that had a positve tone when talking about fishing it.

It's one of my favorite streams.

 

[Bamboozle]

When I first fished Big Springs after the "restoration," the first thing I said was. "This reminds me of Little Lehigh," (Section 08, Former Heritage Waters) in regards to the number of people fishing and the ease of getting in close & personal.

Take that for what it is worth depending on your opinion of the Little Lehigh... 😉

 

[Mike]

I only discovered Big Spring Creek a few years ago, and it’s been an intriguing stream for me ever since. It’s one of the few places I have fished that has a good population of wild rainbows, and spotting a few fish in the 18-inch-plus range certainly keeps me coming back.

I headed over the other day because I’m still recovering from quadriceps tendon repair surgery back in May, and the creek offers some relatively easy wading. After a couple hours of catching my usual 4"–9" wild rainbows, I pulled out my camp chair and enjoyed a hoagie and a cigar before heading home.

While I was sitting there, a local fellow came over and started telling me how much worse the creek has been since the restoration. I mostly listened and offered a few “Oh yeah?” and “That’s too bad” responses. I didn’t want to argue, especially since I never fished it before the work was done and had nothing to compare it with.

But the conversation left me curious. To my untrained eyes, the creek looks healthy, and I’ve enjoyed the fishing. I also realize that catching fish doesn’t tell the whole story.

For those who knew Big Spring before the restoration, do you think it’s worse off today? If so, in what ways—habitat, insect life, trout numbers or size, or something else?

I’m asking sincerely. I’ve only gotten to know the creek as it is now, and I’d be interested in hearing from people who have a longer history with it.

Absolutely better post restoration if you are looking for a population of wild ST and RT that is spread out and in decent numbers over a much longer distance. I electrofished the entire special reg area many times back in the 1970’s and 1980’s and then did so once after the restoration had taken hold for a few years and it wasn’t even close. Everyone has their preferences though. The “ditch” area directly below the spring source was a mix of wild trout and hatchery escapees of various sizes in the “old days.” Many people liked that high density of fish. The exchange, however, was that there was a very low density population throughout the rest of the special reg area except in the riffle below the “dam” at the tail end of the ditch, under the bridge immediately below that area, and in the riffle immediately down from the bridge. The the rest of the special reg area other than at and under the fish barrier when it existed, was largely dead water as far as I was concerned. There were few fish elsewhere and a few stacked up rainbows, perhaps numbering 4-6, at the occasional short spots where water velocity momentarily picked up. You could also find an occasional trophy BT, but that was it.