wildtrout2
Well-known member
I guess we'll have to create a stream biologist oversight committee. 😉Well explained. Let's just hope the "investigators" base thier finding on biological facts and not solely on thier "judgement".
I guess we'll have to create a stream biologist oversight committee. 😉Well explained. Let's just hope the "investigators" base thier finding on biological facts and not solely on thier "judgement".
The PFBC and they have established guidelines and policies for many categories of wild streams . Most of the categories are based on species, biomass, length and percentage of species. Lots of details from the PFBC in the attached PDF.Who gets to determine what is or is not a stream that "supports" wild trout and how many wild trout need to be in a "supporting stream" to make that determination?
Other states get it … but habitat destruction has put PA in a corner as far as maintaining wild Browns as the ST keep disappearing further up and further in![]()
Pennsylvania wild trout advocates target hatchery and stocking reform
A new coalition wants the state to stop stocking hatchery-raised trout over streams with wild populations, as the Fish and Boat Commission faces a fiscal crisis while spending about 30% of operating funds on hatcheries.www.pennlive.com