BradFromPotter
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2006
- Messages
- 1,657
I have a hard time believing it's real. He said it was 16" but this looks quite a bit bigger.Cmon boys its all ai these days lol lol. I even got a few huge gemmies that were 18 + that were beautiful co op sportsmens club plants that looked every bit wild lol lol to the untrained eye i believe that is what is going on here. Trust me these people think were all dummies here and dont know the diff. Mostly kids who want their 15 mins of fame
Looks to be in the 18"-20" range. Whatever it's size, it isn't a Pa native brookie.I have a hard time believing it's real. He said it was 16" but this looks quite a bit bigger.
Looks like a lake trout.Its real.
Look, here is another 16" brook trout caught in a small UNT to a class A in NEPA last fall.
you guys are Debbie downers!
View attachment 1641253726
Nah, The fish lost some of its color after a long hike down from the mountain lake where it was caught.Looks like a lake trout.
Pics?Thing is, I've caught a fair amount of dream size natives in PA over they years.
My 15.5" native was no where near the size of this fish in the OP.
Beautiful fish. Or were the colors enhanced. Just sagjn i know with all these settings on cameras we can pretty much manipulate anythingYeah I just posted it the other week remember? This fish was 15.5. I call it 15" cause of the rudimentary way of measuring off a rod. I was confident with xalling it 15".
Compare this fish and that fish. His is much larger than 16". The anal fin along has to be over 4"
Believe it or not, not much. With that old camera I had to adjust the contrast to very dark for it to take picture well. Which often made the colors pop some but this fish was very brightBeautiful fish. Or were the colors enhanced. Just sagjn i know with all these settings on cameras we can pretty much manipulate anything