Oregon ballot initiative would ban fishing

I think that's a great idea. What I think I need to do is start planting more cats in people's homes so they too can become infected by the cat-crazies. Once I have a state full of cat-crazies and all citizens are thoroughly infected, there is no way this wouldn't pass. My geographic location does benefit my takeover of the state.

I really do like my cats, but this proposal is asinine; it will never pass.
Now you’re thinking like a politician 😂
 

Oregon animal rights initiative aims to ban hunting, fishing, slaughtering of livestock​



"It’s no sure thing that the initiative will make it onto the November ballot. Organizers have gathered more than 92,000 signatures since summer 2024, but they need to hit the required 117,173 by July 2. With about 25,000 more to go, they are roughly 79% of the way there."

Only 700,000 fishing licenses sold in PA would be easy to do. Then we would not have an issue stocking over wild.....
I have a hard time seeing it passing. Oregon, despite its 'woke' profile from outsiders, is, like Vermont, a hunting and fishing state. I'll certainly be fighting against it.
 
I think "it" would be fine considering it is a fish.

I'll keep the controversial side out of this but people really screwed up when they settled on "they" as an acceptable pronoun for a singular person. Regardless of what you believe, it introduces unnecessary ambiguity to a language that developed words specifically for clarity in such situations. It is undoubtedly a regression.
Another example is "Woke" adding unnecessary ambiguity of language. This thread went the exact way of the one attempting to regulate fur.
 
A few years back I recall reading a study that fish feel “pain.” I said here they come. And this from a guy who considers himself to be left of Abby Hoffman.
Abby would be considered left of center by today's standards. I bet you initiated a few google searches.
 
whether it passes or not isn't the point. It's more that there are that many people who think like that. What's the over-under? 70% have leather seats, chairs and belts. As other said feed their cats/dogs meat products?
 
whether it passes or not isn't the point. It's more that there are that many people who think like that. What's the over-under? 70% have leather seats, chairs and belts. As other said feed their cats/dogs meat products?
That was my thought too. That and the ratio of sportspeople to the general population. Ask a young person what they do with their time off and it is computer games. It is not following tracks, hiking streams, or even shooting weapons. They shoot keyboard weapons on computer screens on teams made up of friends online.
real issue is Sportspeople are falling out of outdoor activities faster than they can be recruited in.
 
That was my thought too. That and the ratio of sportspeople to the general population. Ask a young person what they do with their time off and it is computer games. It is not following tracks, hiking streams, or even shooting weapons. They shoot keyboard weapons on computer screens on teams made up of friends online.
real issue is Sportspeople are falling out of outdoor activities faster than they can be recruited in.
That and the stewards of the outdoors within our government largely end up being milquetoast politicians. Why is that woman from Pittsburgh leading up the fisheries and game committee in Harrisburg? Has she ever shot a gun or held a fishing rod in her life?

Is it time for me to run for office?
 
Once a proposal hits the ballot box, rather than run it course through the legislature, it s pretty much do or die. if it fails you'll never see it again. This may be the strategy. There are over 4million people in Oregon. It wouldn't be crazy that they might have 62,000 vegans. and some guy will sing it in front of some girl he's trying to impress. Sometimes you just gotta let the kid stick his finger in the ourtet and find out for himself.
 
That and the stewards of the outdoors within our government largely end up being milquetoast politicians. Why is that woman from Pittsburgh leading up the fisheries and game committee in Harrisburg? Has she ever shot a gun or held a fishing rod in her life?

Is it time for me to run for office?
Or “that man” from lower Allen Township who chairs the senate side of things. Real estate
Guy who isn’t likely to be preserving any open space to continue our time honored traditions. At least Cumberland County has no fishing tradition to save. Oh wait!
 
In other news, PETA sent a letter to the Punxsutawney Groundhog Club’s president, Tom Dunkel, with an offer to replace Punxsutawney Phil with a hologram... 🙄
 
I think that's a great idea. What I think I need to do is start planting more cats in people's homes so they too can become infected by the cat-crazies. Once I have a state full of cat-crazies and all citizens are thoroughly infected, there is no way this wouldn't pass. My geographic location does benefit my takeover of the state.

I really do like my cats, but this proposal is asinine; it will never pass.
Cat crazies? I’ve had pairs of cats for 30 years, I’m not that nuts🤣

Sidebar calico cat fur makes for good dubbing in a pinch. Just saying.
 
Cat crazies? I’ve had pairs of cats for 30 years, I’m not that nuts🤣

Sidebar calico cat fur makes for good dubbing in a pinch. Just saying.
I've used cat fur as dubbing lots. That's why we have five house cats in various colorations.
 
I think "it" would be fine considering it is a fish.

I'll keep the controversial side out of this but people really screwed up when they settled on "they" as an acceptable pronoun for a singular person. Regardless of what you believe, it introduces unnecessary ambiguity to a language that developed words specifically for clarity in such situations. It is undoubtedly a regression.
Although it seems to be overused nowdays, it's been in use that way for centuries.
 
They found 92,000 people to sign that? That's nearly 3% of Oregon's adults. I hope there are a lot of fraudulent signatures because I don't have much hope for a state where 3% of the residents have already lost their minds.

I wonder what percentage of those who signed have pet cats and didn't think through the fact that their beloved companions are obligate carnivores.

Some people need to be exposed to more natural occurrences. It's a rough world out there. If you are a critter who isn't human, loved by a human, or swiftly killed to feed a human, the "unaliving" event is going to be pretty horrific.
It's easy to get someone to sign a petition since a lot of times it gets some annoying putz out of your space. A solid percentage of that 92,000 won't vote for it, and some of them won't vote at all. Also, there's the matter of the signatures usually need to be from registered voters and confirmed as such. Most petition drives usually seek to exceed the required number by 10 percent or so to account for double signers and non-registered voter signers. At this rate, it may not even end up on the ballot, but if it does, even if every signer (117,000 plus) voted for it, it fails miserably. There's more than 3 million registered voters in the state, and on a non-presidential year, about 75 percent show up.

In 2024, there were about 500,000 fishing licenses, and 700,000 people issued deer permits. No doubt plenty of crossover, but they account for a much bigger block of voters than PETA could hope to amass. Inexplicably, PETA gets hunters and anglers riled up as though it were a big deal organization, but it's like one crying baby in a crowded church: it makes a lot of noise, but doesn't have much of an overall effect.

(Interestingly, PETA claims 91,000 members in Oregon, which means they've actually gathered 1,000 signatures.)
 
Back
Top