Chrome Hill Solar Project Threatens Wild Brook Trout

2bmeuc

New member
Joined
Feb 23, 2022
Messages
18
City
MD
The Chrome Hill Solar project is a proposed 5 MW community solar plant on about 44 acres off Rigdon Road in Jarrettsville. It is in front of the Maryland Public Service Commission as Case 9874. The site sits squarely in the Stirrup Run basin, a tributary to Deer Creek which begins near Stewartstown, PA.

Stirrup Run is designated by Maryland as Use III-P Natural Trout Waters. That is the cold-water designation meant to protect natural trout reproduction. As of this writing, I am the only person who has raised brook trout concerns in comments to the PSC. I am raising it because this basin holds self-sustaining wild brook trout.

Maryland’s DNR’s statewide brook trout surveys (2014–2018), which documented a 27% decline in brook trout occupancy statewide and approximately 50% loss in the Piedmont region (Carroll, Baltimore, and Harford counties), and identify Stirrup Run as one of the few remaining streams supporting a self‑sustaining native brook trout population.

My concern is thermal runoff. A solar panel in full sun can reach about 150-160 degrees on its surface. When a summer rain shower hits a 45 acre field of hot panels, that water warms and runs off the site and downstream. In a small stream like Stirrup Run, a pulse of warm water goes straight to the brook trout.

There is a lot of local resistance to this project on farmland and viewshed grounds, but the Commission has not been given any indication, that I am aware of, that harm could come to the brook trout.

If you fish Deer Creek or care about one of the few remaining wild brook trout streams we have in Harford County, please reach out to the Maryland Public Service Commission and reference Case 9874 Chrome Hill Solar, LLC and Stirrup Run. Ask them to consider the thermal impacts to self-sustaining brook trout in the Stirrup Run Watershed.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7232.jpeg
    IMG_7232.jpeg
    383.3 KB · Views: 35
In a perfect world the Use III-P designation alone would be enough for MDE to block the project but sadly that hasn't been the case lately. Instead developers get approved with requirements to put in some best management practices with no follow-up on what the post-construction thermal impacts actually are. If the BMPs actually worked at preserving the state's most sensitive cold water resources, we wouldn't have seen 50% of piedmont brook trout streams disappear! The standards have proven insufficient.

This is the problem with these isolated brook trout streams on private land in developing areas...hardly anybody knows they are there until it's too late. By the way, that 50% statistic is going to be even higher after this year based on what I've heard from DNR about this year's survey results in the region.
 
Check out the aerial of the "pond" on the site. Sure looks like some springs and wetlands to me. Yeah, I would say this site warrants extremely thorough investigation and consideration of environmental impacts.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20260805-084244.png
    Screenshot_20260805-084244.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 29
It just makes me sad. But we as anglers also have a responsibility to voice objections. There is a mentality of, “That sucks, but It’s not my fishing hole” and life goes on. And I’m probably guilty as well, but we need to change this going forward. I know I am. If nothing more than sending a quick email off to an official in support of our fisheries.
 
Check out the aerial of the "pond" on the site. Sure looks like some springs and wetlands to me. Yeah, I would say this site warrants extremely thorough investigation and consideration of environmental impacts.
The site was an over grazed pasture and corn field with bad stream erosion. MDE probably figures it can’t get much worse,. They don’t see a need to do a thorough impact. Sadly, if a buffer was built along the stream, the brooks would probably flourish. A major restoration project on the main stem of the north branch was just done a few years ago. This watershed was headed in the right direction.
 
The site was an over grazed pasture and corn field with bad stream erosion. MDE probably figures it can’t get much worse,. They don’t see a need to do a thorough impact. Sadly, if a buffer was built along the stream, the brooks would probably flourish. A major restoration project on the main stem of the north branch was just done a few years ago. This watershed was headed in the right direction.
That's good info about there being a large investment in a recent restoration. Feel free to message me any more specifics that could help when I write in.
 
That's good info about there being a large investment in a recent restoration. Feel free to message me any more specifics that could help when I write in.
Thanks! If I think of anymore info, will send it your way!
 
Back
Top