Spring Creek - Centre County 10/21/15

RLeep2

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 15, 2009
Messages
1,584
Fisherman's Paradise section of Spring Creek (not my first choice, but I had the Mrs. with me and she likes the benches and nearby restroom access...) Noon to approx. 3:30 PM. Partly cloudy with air temps mid to upper 60's and water temp of 53F at about 1PM. Creek at about normal level and "limestone clear" (very slight murk..). A few trike spinners around 12:30 to which the fish paid little if any attention.

I don’t normally post stream reports, but I thought the following might be of interest in the sense that it sort of illustrates that there is more than one way to skin a c.., er, successfully approach a heavily pressured piece of water. It also reinforces what I believe to be one of the cardinal rules of fishing water that gets pounded pretty hard: Doing something unorthodox that the fish have not seen very often can be heap powerful medicine in situations like this.

To stop philosophizing and cut to the chase, I landed about 20 browns between 9 and 14 inches in the 3.5 or so hours I was on the water and probably missed or rolled close to that many more. All the fish took a poorly tied #10 deerhair ant fished on 6X. I did not fish the pools or slower water, but instead concentrated on the very shallow water tight to the bank and on small bankside pockets adjacent to these places in the broken water sections of the lower Paradise. I don’t think I ever bothered casting more than 10 feet away from the bank and the vast majority of the takes were within 3-5 feet of the bank in water that was seldom more than 18 inches deep. I just plopped the ant down in what looks like a good spot and as often not, I’d see a wake headed for the fly and away we’d go…. I think the longest cast I made all afternoon was about 25-30 feet. This was mostly pretty close work. Over the years, unless there were enough bugs to get the fish’s attention, this is pretty much the way I’ve always fished most PA limestones once the water temps got up to reliable surface fishing levels. From about mid-May to the first hard frost in the Fall, it has always worked pretty well for me whether I was on Spring Creek or Fishing Creek or Honey Creek or down in the Cumberland Valley. I’d be the first guy to admit this probably isn’t the best way to move the biggest fish in the creek. But as a technique to keep the rod bent and the interest level high, it sure is a pleasant way to spend an afternoon. And I virtually never see anybody else doing this, which I’ve never really understood..
 
RLeeP - I've long enjoyed your writing. Just wanted to say I got a chuckle out of your use of a "poorly tied" deer hair ant.
 
If it was "well tied", it would become poorly tied by fish #3 anyway.

I bank fish SC pretty frequently, err, I did when I was up there more often. Find a place where current flows up against a rocky bank. Each bankside rock forces the current around it, creating a bit of a funnel, and a trout sits off every single rock. Often I actually cast onto shore quite purposely, mend, then pull the fly into the water and let it float around said rock. Many strikes come literally inches from the shore.

My biggest Penns Creek brown during the jam last year came doing exactly this. You're standing in the middle of a huge stream, casting literally onto shore, and then pulling it back and literally fishing the foot of water closest to that bank.

Or, find a true eddy with a current break to the main current. SC has plenty. There's a pod of fish in each of them, and if you get a dry to sit down, you can have some fun. Getting it to sit down is the tough part, as you have to get pretty close, and the direction the fish are facing in such places is rather unpredictable. Using bankside cover and approaching it like a brookie hole works sometimes, though.

I've found that these fish are actually quite often the better fish, with the smaller ones out in the current in the more "obvious" runs and riffs.
 
Not surprised to hear of your success there with that one certain fly. I've done pretty well in the paradise with deer hair ants and crowe beetles - although during the warmer months.
But I've also read many places about terrestrial fishing only being good until the first hard freeze.
Well, we certainly had that around here on monday morning, with a low of 28 degrees. Maybe it didn't get that cold in state college?

I remember reading in George Harveys books about fishing deer hair ants. He kinda claimed that the more mangled they got, the better they worked. More buggy looking?
I always change mine after they start falling apart. But maybe I should keep fishing them as is
 
I wouldn't give up an terrestrials just yet, one overnight of 28deg might be frosty in the morn, but certainly not a 'hard freeze'....one of the most memorable fish I've caught on the Letort took an ant on top, on the opening day of rifle season for deer...
 
I've had good success on spring fishing ants close to shore as well. My best day there came last October fishing ants/beetles tight to the bank. Took many fish that day. I saw flying ants on lycoming creek just yesterday
 
>>I remember reading in George Harveys books about fishing deer hair ants. He kinda claimed that the more mangled they got, the better they worked. More buggy looking?
I always change mine after they start falling apart. But maybe I should keep fishing them as is>>

Well, I understand George's point, but generally, I do what you do and replace the ant after it starts looking like a miniature black pincushion. The main reason I do it this way is that I'm a big believer in the plop value of deer hair ants (which is also why most of my deer hair ants are #10's). The way I fish these ants is a much closer cousin to bass bugging than midging. I think it draws fish more often than it spooks them. An ant that has been ravaged by fish to the point where it has lost its bulk hits the water more like a maple spinner than a chunk of potential trout food. This is also why, for the most part, I don't fish foam ants, although they are even easier to tie than deer hair. I don't think they give me enough plop.

Finally, I've never had to worry about my ants being transformed into a rougher (or more mangled) state by fish so they will catch more fish. Partially by intent and partially because it is the best I feel like bothering to do, they usually come out of my vise looking pretty mangled. I make a point of keeping the deer hair well compressed so I get a good plop. But I also try to make a point of having my ants come out of the vise looking like they were tied by a drunk wearing oven mitts and duct tape over one eye...🙂 Errant hairs, unequal humps, mismatched legs and all. They seem to catch more fish.

Just incidentally I've had some success in making my ants last a few fish longer on average by giving them a real light touch of brush on super glue top and bottom. Just a wee bit though.
 
Sounds like hitting those deer hair ants with a swipe from the .22 bore brush before they a taken out of the vise might make them just about right. I do totally agree with the fact that the profile and sound made by a deer hair ant hitting the surface has an awful lot to do with how productive they are. Good report!
 
Back
Top