Schuylkill, Schuylkill Co., 11/29/20

Floggingtrout

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2018
Messages
68
Fished upper schuylkill on Sunday. Water temp was 52 degrees. Walked 2 river miles with 2 guys and managed to see heron squirrels, bunch of deer and ducks, however we did not find many trout. I was skunked with only one chub. Fellow fisherman had 4 trout ranging from 6 to 13 inches. Brown. A little concerning as we usually do much better in this stretch with good looking water. Hopefully it was lack of angler success rather than population. Tight lines to all
 
Thanks for the report.

I made some edits to your subject line - let me know if I made a mistake.
 
I used to explore those upper reaches of the Skuke quite a bit. It was hit or miss for me. Though you covered a lot of ground... I would, at times, explore the west branch as well. Always did well there.
 
If you were at least a mile east (or north) on Rt 209 from Port Carbon you should have been fishing over anything ranging from a low to moderate to a high density of wild brook trout with some browns potentially mixed in. Densities vary greatly from one mile to another, and even over much shorter distances measured in yards due to changes in water quality, sedimentation (habitat), pH, and iron deposits associated with past mining practices. From about a mile upstream from Port Carbon downstream to the downstream end of Pottsville proper, the trout population is quite poor. It picks up again below Tumbling Run’s confluence and from there to Rt 443 it is annually stocked with BT and RT fingerlings. In addition, based on electrofishing, the wild brook trout population has been recently expanding impressively in the stretch from Tumbling Run downstream for about a mile. Because of this I have recommended to my former colleagues that they consider shifting fingerling stockings to RT only, which would coincidentally happen to be consistent with the recent trout plan update.
 
Thanks for the info walked from cressona to below schuykill haven. Being local I have a soft spot for these hard nosed fish that are now living in this river. The park in schuylkill haven would be a good improvement area with trail and public access.
 
In electrofishing there a number of times, we had never found an overall shortage of trout in the upper half of the specific stretch that you fished, although the population adjacent to the ball fields, etc in the park had been surprisingly limited at times. That has made me wonder about C&R mortality of freshly stocked fingerlings in the park because there has been a lot of evidence of bait angling over the years, probably by kids, seen there in the summer....bait containers, spilled corn, etc. That is the reason why an original fingerling stocking point was moved a short distance away from the park after 15 yrs.

The stretch from the RR bridge down to Rt 443 has never been electrofished although there has been more than adequate time for annual stockings to populate that segment since around 2001. There are fishable numbers of trout in individual spots down from Rt 443 so as long as the trout find the habitat to be suitable, the same should be true from the RR bridge down to Rt 443. There are also some wild brook and brown trout in the stretch that you fished, so I would chalk your experience up to a bad day. It happens.

I too have soft spots for any recovering rivers, streams, and estuaries. I maintain a strong interest in the upper Schuylkill.
 
Thanks Mike crystal clear conditions and fishing downstream because we were a bit lazy may have been a problem. I did wonder however what effect the crazy flash floods had a year or so ago had
 
Back
Top