Was researching some (new to me) waters before an upcoming out-of-state trip and came across this quote about one of them from the state biologist in a survey report:
“… has been stocked regularly with hatchery trout: a procedure considered unnecessary and undesirable. Wild trout have many desirable qualities that hatchery trout lack. The practice of mixing hatchery trout with a perfectly good wild population is poor fishery management. The stocking of hatchery trout should be discontinued.”
Apparently, stocking was discontinued based of these recommendation, and the wild population is flourishing with general harvest regulations. Just got back from fishing there and our crew caught several wild trout between 10” and 17”.
If only PA adopted modern practices like this instead of jamming hatchery trout into places where they aren’t needed. Instead we’re pretending to “study” Freeman Run while other states refer to stocking over wild trout as “poor fishery management.”
The survey and quote were from 1961…
“… has been stocked regularly with hatchery trout: a procedure considered unnecessary and undesirable. Wild trout have many desirable qualities that hatchery trout lack. The practice of mixing hatchery trout with a perfectly good wild population is poor fishery management. The stocking of hatchery trout should be discontinued.”
Apparently, stocking was discontinued based of these recommendation, and the wild population is flourishing with general harvest regulations. Just got back from fishing there and our crew caught several wild trout between 10” and 17”.
If only PA adopted modern practices like this instead of jamming hatchery trout into places where they aren’t needed. Instead we’re pretending to “study” Freeman Run while other states refer to stocking over wild trout as “poor fishery management.”
The survey and quote were from 1961…
