JackM
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2006
- Messages
- 17,349
Point taken unless the rough fish are coldwater chubs, dace and the like, as well as salamanders, and, perhaps, the beginning of a Mayfly culture or two. Perhaps further such efforts improve trout fishing opportunities on the improved stream or downstream waterways that contain trout. How much of water that runs through private land will the improvers claim as either their own or as a mechanism for raising funding for additional projects that benefit smooth fish? That is my only concern, and I think it is somewhat valid.
Maybe some folks think if someone is going to step up and improve wateways at their own expense, that they should enjoy exclusive privileges on some portion set-aside for that purpose. Very well, then, I agree, let's just be honest that this is what is happening and that it is an OK tradeoff from the purely profit-driven pay-to-play locations across the state.
Maybe some folks think if someone is going to step up and improve wateways at their own expense, that they should enjoy exclusive privileges on some portion set-aside for that purpose. Very well, then, I agree, let's just be honest that this is what is happening and that it is an OK tradeoff from the purely profit-driven pay-to-play locations across the state.
