buymanfishheday
New member
I’m open to all types small and large. Everywhere I go the water has been too warm for catch and release. Is it officially bass season?
Peters is a funny little creek. Caught a brookie out of it once, never went back.Perhaps Peters Creek. But you ain't catchin' them! 🤣 There's a number of other Berks spring creeks as well, but access is the big issue. As noted, monitor water temps. It's best to just give the troots a break for the rest of this month and August and target WW species.
Would love to see Peters surveyed but I bet it would be disappointing.Peters creek is fun. Try casting upstream though the culvert under the road.
If you're in that general area, flyfishing below Blue Falls to the bridge is fun. Before I moved to Idaho I used to catch big bluegills, crappie, bass and the occasional small musky by accident. The rest of Maiden creek can even be fished from the bank. Willow creek by the RR bridge used to produce stocked trout, suckers, bass and the occasional brookie.
Peters creek is fun. Try casting upstream though the culvert under the road.
It wasn’t disappointing in the 1980’s, but it declined with continued or increased sedimentation…silt in this case.Would love to see Peters surveyed but I bet it would be disappointing.
Has anyone ever proposed a habitat project for Peters Creek? It's so obviously channelized/ditched.I poked around a few Berks spring creeks back in February of 2024, with lackluster results. Peters Creek, Laurel Run, and Willow Creek are the ones that come to mind. I may have to go back and fish Peters when streamside growth is in, as it would provide some much needed cover.
View attachment 1641252369
Peters Creek, looking downstream toward Lake Ontelaunee
That needs full restoration to restore meander patterns and lots of wood for habitat complexityHas anyone ever proposed a habitat project for Peters Creek? It's so obviously channelized/ditched.
I asked about that creek years ago and was told that the county considers it a Heritage site. (The stream banks were walled of by the CCC in the 1930s to create a straight channel). Perhaps the commissioners can be approached again. Tully TU would be the primary restoration partner if there was interest.Has anyone ever proposed a habitat project for Peters Creek? It's so obviously channelized/ditched.
I don’t see that as being wise in this case, given the historical info, the expense of an extravagant project for such a short stretch of stream, and land use changes. Where present in abundance in the stream, the Class A ST population was quite impressive when the combination of abundance and size were considered, and at the time the stream, at least from a cursory perspective, appeared largely as it does in the pics provided. The undercut walls provided plenty of overhead cover, as did the water cress; however, due to lack of sunlight at that time, there was little to no cress in the wooded portion. That may have changed by now with a natural shift over time away from what I recall were evergreens in the wooded portion. Since the rest was a vegetated “meadow” limestoner (with walls), there was no shortage of forage. Over time, however, sediments built up to feet in depth, which effectively reduced the relative hight of the walls above the stream bottom in some stretches. The cress and other vascular aquatic plants aided in the deposition and sediment retention. Only a few hundred meters of the stream held the vast majority of the fish. Even if attempted, restoration would most likely be short-lived, given land use in the past and that which is occurring now in the drainage.That needs full restoration to restore meander patterns and lots of wood for habitat complexity