Wulff - guilty as charged. After my first fibreglass starters way back when in the last century (Wright & McGill, then a fabulous SciAng on a Hardy blank), I moved right into an Orvis Flea, then a bunch of other cane, some production, some not.
I ffished the early graphites, but though I loved to cast them, I didn't care for their troutability (or lack thereof). Then I won a raffled graphite stick - an Orvis, which I set down to learn to love. Over the decades, I would average another boo for every half dozen plastics. I was always intrigued by the incessant new generations of graphite. And I always loved the various early borons, solid and hollow. And then there were the modern glasses, especially for light trouting.
But looking over my database (actually a severely tweaked spreadsheet), I notice I put more hours on cane than any other 'substrate'. Except for when I fly, especially since TSA came along. And in a boat, especially with metal gunwales, I steer clear of hollow plastic tubes. Hexagraphs are my go-tos there.
Cane, depending on the taper, provide much more feel during presentation and especially during the play of the trouts. In general, the faster the rod, the higher my percentage of lost trouts.
hp
les