My Kind of Fly Rods

Billems

Active member
Joined
Sep 23, 2020
Messages
111
Not that it matters; just stating that I prefer slower action fly rods. Whether they're bamboo, graphite or fiberglass, I like that full, progressive action. Some of my favorites are: The old Orvis Far & Fine 7'9". The old Fenwicks; the Winston IM6 rods. The early Scott G graphites. The early, two piece Sage Lines. In bamboo, I love 8040sthe Jenkins 8-footers, The Granger 8040s, The pre-fire Leonard 50s, and a 7'6" Mark Ruhe Premiere. Nearly all are 5wts, though the bamboos will easily bend for fours. This poor boy with champagne tastes is lucky enough to own two Jenkins 8 footers and an old Goodwin Granger Special. The nicest cheap rod I own is the Redington Trout Classic, a nine-foot five weight. Those Trout Classics are the best buy in great casting fly rods.
 
I'm in for slow to moderate action for trout fishing but I prefer fast rods for warmwater.

I guess it is because I cut my teeth on a graphite Orvis Limestone Special and a Fenwick HMG which were considerably more moderate than today's graphite cannons. After that it was nothing but bamboo for 20+ years.

Today the trout quiver is bamboo, newer glass and moderate graphite rods that not coincidentally, happen to be Winston.

I have too many rods because I have too many favorites, but a few are the Orvis Seven Four, Bill Harms 8'0" 5wt and a Leonard 38H in bamboo; McFarland 8'0" 5wt Spruce Creek, Tom Morgan Rodsmiths 7'0" 3wt and a 6'6" 3wt Winston Retro in glass and in graphite the 8'0" 4wt Tom Morgan Favorite, 8'6" 5wt Winston DL4 and the 8'6" 3wt Winston WT.
 
I chased around slower actions, even parabolic rods for awhile. I have a great 8'3" full-flexing wet fly rod from Bill Critchfield that is a blast to fish. It's tough for me to keep swinging wets though when trout are taking on top, although its potentially more effective. What I've come to find is, while I like them all, I like progressive feeling rods the most. I fish some bamboo, but this year I've been plying an original Scott G 905-4 and a Winston BIIt 9' for 5wt. Both are very pleasing to cast.
 
Dear Billems,

I have Sage LL rods, a 279 and a 389 that I like. I almost bought a Sage 4711 on eBay the other day, but I chickened out. I fished one of them many years ago and on a stream the size of Spring Creek in Centre County or anything smaller it was the perfect do it all trout rod. From midges to weighted wooly buggers it did everything.

I have a number of bamboo rods in the traditional 8 1/2- or 9-foot lengths for weights 5 through 7 from SB, Heddon, Granger, and Wright and McGill. They are modestly moderate in flex but once I adjust my timing a bit, they fish every bit as well as my modern fast graphite rods.

I can cast just about anything but have only hung onto the rods I liked casting and fishing. I still use a 7 1/2 foot Sceptre rod that I bought from Steve Sywensky when FFP was still a 4' x12' section of the front of the Lemont Post Office. It's still a nice rod as are the South Bend and Fenwick glass rods I own.

Regards,

Tim Murphy 🙂
 
I'm in for slow to moderate action for trout fishing but I prefer fast rods for warmwater.

I guess it is because I cut my teeth on a graphite Orvis Limestone Special and a Fenwick HMG which were considerably more moderate than today's graphite cannons. After that it was nothing but bamboo for 20+ years.

Today the trout quiver is bamboo, newer glass and moderate graphite rods that not coincidentally, happen to be Winston.

I have too many rods because I have too many favorites, but a few are the Orvis Seven Four, Bill Harms 8'0" 5wt and a Leonard 38H in bamboo; McFarland 8'0" 5wt Spruce Creek, Tom Morgan Rodsmiths 7'0" 3wt and a 6'6" 3wt Winston Retro in glass and in graphite the 8'0" 4wt Tom Morgan Favorite, 8'6" 5wt Winston DL4 and the 8'6" 3wt Winston WT.
I've cast a McFarland Spruce Creek. It's on my bucket list.
 
The Orvis Far & Fine seems like faster action to me than Winston rods or the old fiberglass Fenwicks.
 
The Orvis Far & Fine seems like faster action to me than Winston rods or the old fiberglass Fenwicks.
I have a far and fine and although many like it, I do not. Something about the action was causing me to snap off fish on the take. Especially on lighter tippet. I would consider it a slow action in comparison to my 4 wt Winston. Very different rods of course.
 
Not that it matters; just stating that I prefer slower action fly rods. Whether they're bamboo, graphite or fiberglass, I like that full, progressive action. Some of my favorites are: The old Orvis Far & Fine 7'9". The old Fenwicks; the Winston IM6 rods. The early Scott G graphites. The early, two piece Sage Lines. In bamboo, I love 8040sthe Jenkins 8-footers, The Granger 8040s, The pre-fire Leonard 50s, and a 7'6" Mark Ruhe Premiere. Nearly all are 5wts, though the bamboos will easily bend for fours. This poor boy with champagne tastes is lucky enough to own two Jenkins 8 footers and an old Goodwin Granger Special. The nicest cheap rod I own is the Redington Trout Classic, a nine-foot five weight. Those Trout Classics are the best buy in great casting fly rods.
My expensive rod is a Reddington Classic Trout but I also love my cheap rods. I’m either the best caster in the world or the biggest oaf with a rod because I can cast them all and not be able to articulate one difference between any of them. It’s a blessing in disguise.
 
I've cast a McFarland Spruce Creek. It's on my bucket list.

My McFarland Spruce Creek rods are his first generation smooth blank rods that Mike was building before the Seele collaboration, so about 15+ years ago. They are more moderate than the newer versions.

Just wondering, I assume the Orvis Far & Fine you mention is the 7'9" 5wt graphite version?? I ask because there was a 7'6" 5wt bamboo version of the Far & Fine made in the 1990's - early 200's that was a really nice rod too!!
 
the slowest fly rod i own is a 9' south fork 5wt. i rarely use it, or most of the other noodles i own (including a spruce creek 7'9" 3/4). at least the mcfarland is light in the hand, the south fork is just unwieldy.

the only rod i own two of is the fenwick ff756, incase one breaks. i actually fish it with a 5wt rather than the 6 it ws intended for, although i've decided to pick up bamboo snobbery as my new past time where i seem to prefer them to be faster (h-i prince, sb 359) rather than slower (hardy fairy).

it's not the slowness that i find appealing, it's the appreciable weight in the tip that you feel in casting. i do have a 9' 4wt orvis superfine build that i made for my all-around rod. orvis told me it was full flex, but it doesn't feel as good without that heft in the tip end.

each to their own.
 
I always liked IM6 graphite. Have three I bought from Cabelas over thirty years ago. Two broke from casting so much but I fixed them. My favorite rod is a 8’ 6wt. Orvis Rocky Mountain rod. Came with rod bag and aluminum rod tube. $180 in 1993. My only regret is I didn’t get a 9’. I have four Redington rods: a Path rod, a Pursuit, an RS2 and a Classic Trout . Very happy with them. I have an Orvis HLS Silver Label 9’6wt. which is a stiffer rod I got for under $200 when they were discontinuing the model. I mainly use that rod for steelhead.
 
My McFarland Spruce Creek rods are his first generation smooth blank rods that Mike was building before the Seele collaboration, so about 15+ years ago. They are more moderate than the newer versions.

Just wondering, I assume the Orvis Far & Fine you mention is the 7'9" 5wt graphite version?? I ask because there was a 7'6" 5wt bamboo version of the Far & Fine made in the 1990's - early 200's that was a really nice rod too!!
I like both the graphite and bamboo. Spruce Creeks are first -rate. Plan to get one someday.
 
Yes. But with a double taper 444, they're sublime.
I meant that the Orvis Far & Fine seemed faster than those other rods as a GOOD thing. I've never owned an Orvis Far & Fine but I've casted them several times and really liked them.
 
Back
Top