Go to page 6.
Some interesting historical perspectives on stocking over native brook trout.
Thanks to Mike for letting me know about this article, which he just recently learned about.
Haha yea different time for sure. I have a feeling back when the henryville angler house and these well to do fly fishing clubs existed that there was alot of hypocrisy. Their log books are full of guests boasting 120 fish days and taking old timey pictures of 100 brookies strung out hanging on a game poll by their gills. But then the quest for the golden trout book alot of these historical rich angling clubs also bought private streams because of the “heathens and poachers”. Angling’s relationship with and biases on conservation has come a long way but has a long way to go. Interesting to travel back in time like this by reading an old publication though.I found it interesting that the guy highlighting the negatives of stocking wild brook trout streams estimated he killed 10 of the 20 brookies he caught by using bait.
Seems like a broken system where trained fisheries biologist are unable to get nominated individuals with no fisheries science backgrounds to make recommended changes.He was the chief of the division of fisheries but did not have the power to make the change, even though he thought it would be beneficial.
The Commissioners were the deciders, not the biologist/managers.
True back in 1968, and still true today.
Yea Pennsylvania has been stuck in the immediate post industrial revolution, henry fords model-T, and great depression of wild native brook management for some time now.He was the chief of the division of fisheries but did not have the power to make the change, even though he thought it would be beneficial.
The Commissioners were the deciders, not the biologist/managers.
True back in 1968, and still true today.
I've been a subscriber forever and it's been the ONLY fishing periodical I subscribe to for years.Nothing like going through old Pa. Anglers!