DavidFin wrote:
That's exactly why I'm interested. Because every time I cast something slower (glass, Winston, etc), it makes me frustrated with the faster graphite stuff I have. Not to say there isn't a place for that stuff, I think the slower stuff feels more fun, which is why Im curious about bamboo.
Dave, I haven't read all the responses yet, but I can only imagine the variation in responses.
I've used various bamboo rods. I had a hobby of rebuilding old production rods. There is a whole lot of variation in not only weight, but action.
My smaller stream rod was (and will be again some day) a 1934 H-I that I shortened and repaired. It started life as a slow action 3 piece 8.5 ft, that people would probably call a wet fly rod. Fairly light, and slow. I used it a lot in my teens, but eventually broke the tip section right in the middle. It basically de-laminated and splintered. I glued it back together and gave it to an elderly couple that was into antiques. They had a place to display it. Well, several years later after the wife died, the guy gave it back. He wanted to make sure I got it. So I decided to rebuild it to put it back in service. After repairs and modifications, it was then about 8 foot, give or take an inch or two. But what the repairs did was made it a much faster rod (changed the taper of the tip section), which made it a great dry fly rod. It was my first rebuild and to this day, probably my best as far as appearance. I used all the best components. The truncated serrated nickle silver ferrules were over $50 a pair and that was almost 20 ears ago. Top of the line nickle silver reel seat, Rosewood insert, premium cork grip. Find Gossamer silk winding. I even put a nickle silver hook keep on it.
But the repair I made in the middle of that tip section did not hold up. But I did get to use it for awhile, and the first time out, I caught trout. That was an awesome feeling, and if that rod could talk...
Anyway, I still have it and do intend to replace the tip section. I'm sure I already have a blank that will work. I just need to make the time.
I also have a Shakespeare Spring Brook and the case is marked Bass Weight. These rods were made by South Bend. It is a 3 piece 9 foot with moderate action and I could cast a 7 or 8WF to the backing. When I got it, I paid $75 and it looked like new with two tip sections, original sock and tube.
Of course with that kind of abuse, the grip eventually disintegrated. The cork was dried out. Afterall, it was over 50 years old. I eventually rebuilt it as well and added a fighting butt. It became my go to bass and steelhead rod.
Had another Spring Brook that was not marked Bass Weight, but frankly, I couldn't tell the difference. I bought it off Ebay for about $50, but it came with only 1 tip and no sock or case. I used it for about a year while I was rebuilding the other, and then sold it on Ebay for about $75 (after repairing some wingdings. then proceeded to break the other again. :roll:
Broke the mid section flush with the ferrule. Actually that happened twice. I don't like the ferrules that South Bend used.
Then several years back, I bought a bundle of bamboo fly rod pieces, and mainly for an H-I Tonka Queen butt section. Tonka Queen is a very good dry fly rod. unfortunately I don't have a tip section for it, yet. Well, in that bundle was also a 9 foot cheap post war Japanese production rod that was intact. Actually several intact rods, but that 9 footer eventually became my steelhead rod. Weighs a lot less than the Springbrook and slower action. it was a nasty looking blank. Just milled and not planed, so it had lots of gaps. But after much work, it didn't look all that bad, and I really liked the action. I didn't get as fancy with that rebuild, and probably have less than $100 in parts.
there was an 8.5 in there of similar quality that I also rebuilt and gave to a friend. I don't think he ever used it. He's into expensive plastic, and I thin this one became a wall decoration.
Rebuilt a 9 ft Montague Clipper once. It's a cheap production rod even by Montague standards. When I rebuilt it, I used more and larger guides to bring it up to modern standards. But I didn't like how it cast. Too slow. So I sold it on Ebay. I hope the guy used it, but it is probably hanging on a wall somewhere. It looked pretty sweet with darker cane, and rose colored windings. The color is actually called Royal Hunt.
Link Don't be fulled by the color chart. When using real spar varnish, it darkens the color to a rich rose color which I also tipped in black. By the way, so far my favorite color on there is the Classic Chestnut also tipped in black. Man does that look rich, especially on a medium colored rod.
There is just so much variation in rid action out there. More so than the plastic.
One year a guy on this site sent me one of his rods that he built. He does really nice work and starts from the raw cane. But I think it is just a hobby. It was at least 10 foot that he built specifically for steelhead. I was afraid to use it but he insisted. He said, if I break it, oh well. Man, there are some awesome people on here.
Anyway, it was a beautiful rod, but was the absolute slowest rod I ever casted. And I was used to some very slow rods. It took me awhile to get used to it, but I eventually caught steel on it, and sent it back with just a minor set. ;-)
I think he transitioned away from the 6 sided and into quads.
BTW, Slow is good for steelhead.
I love talking about this crap, which is why I don't visit the gear section very often.
I may have to restart that old hobby again. In addition to the two or three broken rods that need repairs, I have a few blanks ready to go. I'm getting tired of using plastic fly rods.