I am particularly fond of this statement...
"A second drawback is that the manager or agency implementing a barbless hook
regulation without biological justification assumes there is no cost to the agency for enacting
such regulations, but this may not be the case. Schill and Kline (in press) estimate that 75% of
barbless hook violations on two Idaho waters with barbless hook requirements were made
by individuals who usually comply with the regulations, but occasionally forget to flat ten their
barbs down. If barbless hooks do not reduce hooking mortality significantly and citations are
written to largely honest anglers, the animosity generated by such enforcement may be
counterproductive to fishery agencies (Schill and Kline 1995). In Idaho, 20% of all angling
violations or 534 tickets and warnings were written for barbless hooks violations in 1994 (T.
McArthur, Idaho Fish and Game, unpublished data). The potential to generate unnecessary
hostility from anglers is real, especially if it spreads to other family members, neighbors, and
friends as a result of a ticket. Social and financial costs to management agencies could become
important over time."