Register now on! Login


Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users

'Only 50 years left' for sea fish

2007/1/2 11:55
From Bozeman
Posts: 53

Posted on: 2009/5/26 16:41

Re: 'Only 50 years left' for sea fish

2006/9/10 21:53
From Greensburg, PA
Posts: 63
Offline think the streams are crowded now?

Posted on: 2009/5/26 16:45

Re: 'Only 50 years left' for sea fish

2009/5/8 23:25
Posts: 15
I saw an article title that stated there were only 35 years of resources left on the earth, with current and future consumption trends. Not sure how accurate it was, nonetheless, quite interesting implications if true.

Posted on: 2009/5/26 18:06

Re: 'Only 50 years left' for sea fish

2006/11/2 8:50
Posts: 817
""The benefits of marine-protected areas are quite clear in a few cases; there's no doubt that protecting areas leads to a lot more fish and larger fish, and less vulnerability," he said."

So "the end" is not at all inevitable as the title suggests. If you harvest less fish, you have more fish. Which is as obvious as can be.

The fishing technology available now is capable of simply stripping the ocean clean. If you allow unlimited harvest that will happen. If you restrict harvest, you can have plenty of fish forever. It's simple.

Posted on: 2009/5/26 20:09

You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]

Site Content
Stay Connected facebook instagram RSS Feed

USGS Water Levels
The New Keystone Fly Fishing Book
How many trout did you harvest in 2016
Zero, I am C&R all the way.
1-5 wild trout
1-5 stocked trout
6-10 wild trout
6-10 stocked trout
more than 10 wild trout
more than 10 stocked trout
The poll will close at 2017/2/21 10:26
1 Comment

Copyright 2017 by | Privacy Policy| Provided by Kile Media Group | Design by