
Fish Sticks
Well-known member

Forest restoration: concepts and the potential for its automation
ABSTRACT: In 2014, the UN New York Climate Summit set a goal to restore forest to 350 million hectares of degraded land by 2030, to counter...
That is fascinating. I was involved in drone development early on and did a lot of beta testing for 3DR on their autopilot and the solo platform, and still maintain my FAA license for commercial use. I used them for photogrammetry to gather high-resolution texture maps for point cloud data for mapping and briefly for inspection and background videos for site design modeling. The automated flight path technology coupled with AI to allow the autopilot to make on-the-fly adjustments to flight paths has gotten really good.![]()
Forest restoration: concepts and the potential for its automation
ABSTRACT: In 2014, the UN New York Climate Summit set a goal to restore forest to 350 million hectares of degraded land by 2030, to counter...www.forru.org
Intersting stuff 👍.. Technology and science is always evolving. I read that winch assisted logging started in PA last fall. Its supposed to be a safe, efficient method to log slopes without bad erosion. What impacts will that have on headwaters and tribs of PA? How much woody debris will be left behind in stream beds?![]()
Forest restoration: concepts and the potential for its automation
ABSTRACT: In 2014, the UN New York Climate Summit set a goal to restore forest to 350 million hectares of degraded land by 2030, to counter...www.forru.org
Do you have a link to the winch assisted logging techniques?Intersting stuff 👍.. Technology and science is always evolving. I read that winch assisted logging started in PA last fall. Its supposed to be a safe, efficient method to log slopes without bad erosion. What impacts will that have on headwaters and tribs of PA? How much woody debris will be left behind in stream beds?
The deer thing is a real issue.In PA forests, there is often a lot of seedlings regenerating from neighboring trees. But then the deer eat them. In much of PA that is the main thing hindering forest regeneration.
Drones aren't a solution for that.
There's a much easier solution, that wouldn't cost anything:The deer thing is a real issue.
Predator drones?
Some research is indicating soil quality in particular pH may be limiting regen in a lot of pa forests.
i often wonder how much more large woody debris, hummicky foresred wet areas, and canopy cover mountain streams would have if the game commission just issued more doe tags.One area I hike in is along a cliff. There is a narrow band at the base of the cliff where the rocky talus makes it hard for deer to walk creating a narrow band of undergrowth. Elsewhere, the deer eat everything up to 6 or 7 ft high. When Hurricane Sandy knocked down many woods all that grew back was barberry and ferns. When I was in Michigan they hadn't had a white cedar grow on its own for 80 years. All the cedars had been protected until they were high enough to survive. Deer are a real problem for forests.
Those abrupt transitions are typically tree/forest type. Now, that may have something to do with the soil, sure.. But that high and dry, nothing growing underneath is mainly oak-hickory forest type. The understory is generally low growing stuff like ferns, maybe some huckleberry or mountain laurel patches, but not much in the way of tree regrowth or things that interrupt the line of sight. It looks wide open "pole timber". As you go down you get a more northern hardwood type, with beech, birch, hickory, maple, cherry, etc., so more variation in tree size. And there'll be more regrowth there, in addition to line of sight stuff like grapevines, witch hazel, etc.I'm sure that's true. I noticed years ago that in the high plateau areas, often you see almost nothing growing under the canopy except ferns. Then as you drive along and come down slightly in elevation, suddenly there is a lot of vegetation in the understory. Often it appears as a distinct line, an abrupt transition in the understory, even though the canopy trees looked pretty similar. I think the explanation is that going down in the elevation, you cross the line onto a more fertile soil type, because of different underlying bedrock.
Yea there are like next to no significant predation/hunting I would assume in these Ag/ suburban patches of forest. They need to do something where your actually trying to get buffers planted and they are going next to streams ect. It would be nice if game comission could thin them some how in those areas.Those abrupt transitions are typically tree/forest type. Now, that may have something to do with the soil, sure.. But that high and dry, nothing growing underneath is mainly oak-hickory forest type. The understory is generally low growing stuff like ferns, maybe some huckleberry or mountain laurel patches, but not much in the way of tree regrowth or things that interrupt the line of sight. It looks wide open. As you go down you get a more northern hardwood type, with beech, birch, hickory, maple, cherry, etc. And there'll be more regrowth there, in addition to line of sight stuff like grapevines, witch hazel, etc.
I'd also call attention to logging practices a decade ago. A lot of our forests aren't mixed age. You may have a stand of uniformly 120 year old oaks. In such places, there just isn't going to be much undergrowth. Sure, lightning may hit the odd tree and fell it, leaving a 20 sq. ft spot where light gets through, a sapling will start and immediately get overbrowsed. But if that's your measure, 1 deer in the whole forest is too many, because it takes 1 deer about 20 minutes to overbrowse such a small area. If you get a larger area, like a blowdown or a couple acre clearcut, regrowth does happen.
And regarding doe licenses. There are lots and lots of places that have overpopulations of deer, but they aren't where people hunt. I'm not sure how to solve that issue, but doe licenses aren't targeted to a small enough area. You end up with the "tag gets used where it ain't needed, and no tag used where it is needed" effect.