F
Fishidiot
Active member
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2006
- Messages
- 9,960
Ya gotta love October. While out hiking today to one of my favorite brookie streams in Perry County, I came across this massive oak tree. I'm sentimental about left over old growth (what little there is of it in PA) and giant individual trees. Particularly impressive was that this tree is on state forest land nearly 2000 feet in elevation where I typically don't expect to find large diameter trees. Rather, I usually expect to see 'em in valley creek bottoms on private land. The surrounding forest is mixed oak, mostly second growth but pretty old and this particular spot is nearly a mile from the nearest dirt road. While hiking today, I didn't see a single bit of evidence of human activity (except some cut logs) - not a single piece of litter, not even a footprint.
By comparison, I'm nearly six feet tall. This tree is so massive I thought, when I first glimpsed it, that it must be two trees. Thirty feet up the tree was still about four feet in diameter where it forked. Half the tree is dead but the larger fork seemed healthy with thick leaf canopy. I'd estimate this tree to be in the 250 year class range. Down along the creek I saw dozens of hemlocks and white pines that, while they weren't as massive as this oak, are likely even older. While marveling at this guy, and continuing to think about him during the rest of my hiking/fishing trip, I wondered: How did he manage to cheat the saw a hundred years ago and not burn during the ensuing years of slash fires? This big fella could be a living witness to Native Americans following the ridgeline during the French Indian War era; would have seen the surrounding countryside clear cut; and may have provided shade to CCC workers in the 1930s as they re-planted the forest.
Awesome.
It's nice to see a few of these ancient witnesses to so many bygone years are still standing in our state's public forests. There's something reassuring about that.
By comparison, I'm nearly six feet tall. This tree is so massive I thought, when I first glimpsed it, that it must be two trees. Thirty feet up the tree was still about four feet in diameter where it forked. Half the tree is dead but the larger fork seemed healthy with thick leaf canopy. I'd estimate this tree to be in the 250 year class range. Down along the creek I saw dozens of hemlocks and white pines that, while they weren't as massive as this oak, are likely even older. While marveling at this guy, and continuing to think about him during the rest of my hiking/fishing trip, I wondered: How did he manage to cheat the saw a hundred years ago and not burn during the ensuing years of slash fires? This big fella could be a living witness to Native Americans following the ridgeline during the French Indian War era; would have seen the surrounding countryside clear cut; and may have provided shade to CCC workers in the 1930s as they re-planted the forest.
Awesome.
It's nice to see a few of these ancient witnesses to so many bygone years are still standing in our state's public forests. There's something reassuring about that.