afishinado wrote:
franklin wrote:
It's interesting that on their site they have a section promoting wind and solar power and advocating for renewed credits for them. Following that is a section asking who pays for the costs of fracking. I would ask who pays the costs for subsidizing wind and solar?
BTW, read in interesting study showing that solar power actually contributes to global warming. In fact so does planting trees.
Wow! Talk about a perverted version of conservation.
Fracking injects harmful chemicals into the ground to extract fossil fuels that when burned emit CO2 gas and other harmful pollutants and the oil and gas industries make > $100 billion in profit per year selling it.
Wind and solar provide energy that is clean, self sustaining and cheap in the long term.
Which of the two alternatives would it make sense for our government subsidize and promote. :lol:
I won't even comment on your statement that solar power power and planting trees contribute to global warming.:roll:
The only good thing I take from your post is that at least you ADMIT there even is "global warming / climate change." That's is a (baby) step in the right direction.:-?