Browsing this Thread:
1 Anonymous Users
|
|
Re: Is Angler Transport a Significant Contributor to the Spread of Didymo? |
|
|---|---|---|
![]() Joined:
2009/5/29 6:40 From harlansburg
Posts: 3993
![]() |
Jack, will that be your evening attire at the next jam?
Posted on: 2011/12/18 14:50
|
|
|
|
Re: Is Angler Transport a Significant Contributor to the Spread of Didymo? |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Moderator
![]() Joined:
2006/9/9 9:29 From Monessen, PA
Posts: 19601
![]() |
Only I could make that outfit look cool.
![]()
Posted on: 2011/12/18 16:27
|
|
|
_________________
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. -- Martin Luther King, Jr. |
||
|
|
Re: Is Angler Transport a Significant Contributor to the Spread of Didymo? |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Moderator
![]() Joined:
2006/9/11 8:26 From Chester County
Posts: 7634
![]() |
Quote:
Jack, You're the only one I know that could even make a leopard-skin pill-box hat work for them.
Posted on: 2011/12/20 12:28
|
|
|
|
Re: Is Angler Transport a Significant Contributor to the Spread of Didymo? |
|
|---|---|---|
![]()
Joined:
2007/10/17 10:49 From florida
Posts: 5489
![]() |
Posted on: 2011/12/20 13:17
|
|
|
_________________
"There is nothing more frightening than ignorance in action. Gothe |
||
|
|
Re: Is Angler Transport a Significant Contributor to the Spread of Didymo? |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Joined:
2007/1/2 11:55 From Bozeman
Posts: 19932
![]() |
Two pair of felt boots for me. One with studs, one without. Too many mixed reviews on the rubber soles for me, and can't use studs in drift boats. I am not comfortable going with a straight rubber studless boot, so will continue to use felts in the boat.
My next pair (hopefully not for at least a year) will be studded rubber, but I'll continue to safely use studless felts for my second/boat pair as long as they are available.
Posted on: 2011/12/20 14:01
|
|
|
|
Re: Is Angler Transport a Significant Contributor to the Spread of Didymo? |
|
|---|---|---|
![]()
Joined:
2009/2/10 16:30 From SE PA
Posts: 3443
![]() |
Quote:
Nice find GG. Leads one to hypothesize why didymo doesn't spread like wildfire to other streams in the area. And likely no need to force non-felt boots on the public.
Posted on: 2011/12/21 8:00
|
|
|
|
Re: Is Angler Transport a Significant Contributor to the Spread of Didymo? |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Moderator
![]() Joined:
2006/9/9 9:29 From Monessen, PA
Posts: 19601
![]() |
Quote:
Tom, those are Orvis products. Can you get me a discount? I don't think Orvis carries the Leopard-skin, Pill-box hat anymore, though. The leopard is endangered, and Orvis is socially responsible.
Posted on: 2011/12/25 11:20
|
|
|
_________________
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. -- Martin Luther King, Jr. |
||
|
|
Re: Is Angler Transport a Significant Contributor to the Spread of Didymo? |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Moderator
![]() Joined:
2006/9/11 8:26 From Chester County
Posts: 7634
![]() |
Merry X-mas, Jack. A gift of a little big "D"
Posted on: 2011/12/25 11:41
|
|
|
|
Re: Is Angler Transport a Significant Contributor to the Spread of Didymo? |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Moderator
![]() Joined:
2006/9/9 9:29 From Monessen, PA
Posts: 19601
![]() |
He opened the last tour often with it:
Yes, that's Mark Knoffler of Dire Straits.
Posted on: 2011/12/25 12:19
|
|
|
_________________
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. -- Martin Luther King, Jr. |
||
|
|
Re: Is Angler Transport a Significant Contributor to the Spread of Didymo? |
|
|---|---|---|
![]()
Joined:
2011/4/3 10:11 From Warrington
Posts: 78
![]() |
This copy was vetted by biologists at the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission so I tend to think it is absolutely true. Dry your gear! Diatoms are microscopic algae that easily spread. Didymosphenia geminata (Didymo) has been spreading in the Delaware River watershed, creating thick mats in streams and smothering aquatic plants and small aquatic insects, reducing fish habitat and food sources. Unfortunately, the primary carriers of Didymo include fishing equipment, waders, boats, and just about anything else that has come in contact with Didymo-infected water.
Posted on: 2012/1/2 18:05
|
|
|
|
Re: Is Angler Transport a Significant Contributor to the Spread of Didymo? |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Joined:
2008/1/31 17:19 From Pretty much everywhere at some point, Thorndale today.
Posts: 10506
![]() |
I'm a felt fan. I've never had rubber that came anywhere near felt on slimy stream rocks, but I've had rubber that is a fair bit worse.
As far as longevity, typically the boot wears out before my felt does. I do agree felt is inferior on mud and snow. Both are fairly rare for me to encounter while trout fishing. That said, yes, I do certainly think it's possible for felt to transfer invasives. I have 2 pairs of felt to rotate, and lately my fishing has been more quality than quantity. If a single pair of boots sees two different streams within about a month of each other, I do the clorox thing in between. That hasn't happened since July. Return trips to the same stream, and boot rotation when I don't, have kept me from having to do it too often. The easier answer for me is freezing. It kills didymo and is easier, better for the boots than a clorox soak. But it's didymo specific, it may not prevent transfer of other things. And while easy, I'm not sure my wife will approve of wading boots in the freezer!
Posted on: 2012/1/3 16:28
|
|
|
|
Re: Is Angler Transport a Significant Contributor to the Spread of Didymo? |
|
|---|---|---|
![]() Joined:
2010/11/16 14:02 From Fayette Co, Pa
Posts: 49
![]() |
The main reason for these companies switching to rubber sole boots is prevention. When the big didymo scare came out, not much research was done to indicate exactly how and where it is being transferred. But with it showing up in, I'll call it, random places they look to what could transfer it to these places. Even with the new rubber sole boots, it is not a cure. Didymo is still able to survive in any of the cloth bearing areas on our boots such as the shoelaces.
There are many recommended ways to clean them but I am not a fan of clorox bathes. In maryland on the Casselman River a landowner takes care of wash stations that consist of a salt bath with is also reportedly able to eliminate didymo from our gear.
Posted on: 2012/1/27 13:12
|
|
|
|
Re: Is Angler Transport a Significant Contributor to the Spread of Didymo? |
|
|---|---|---|
![]() Joined:
2006/9/13 10:18 From LV
Posts: 5869
![]() |
Or the foam on the bottom of their boots, or their boots, or if they wet wade their clothes. There's no scientific proof that I'm aware of. My guess is it's spreading as much by natural causes as anything.
Posted on: 2012/2/6 18:30
|
|
|
_________________
"Completely random idiotic rants, on the other hand, get you absolutely nowhere."pcray |
||
|
|
Re: Is Angler Transport a Significant Contributor to the Spread of Didymo? |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Joined:
2006/9/10 21:53 From Greensburg, PA
Posts: 13523
![]() |
Quote:
see its not felt. Its Farmer Dave and rest of those darn wet waders!
Posted on: 2012/2/8 21:38
|
|
You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.














Montana Fly Fishing


