S.O.S. Save Our Susquehanna

afishinado

afishinado

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 11, 2006
Messages
16,162
Location
Chester County, PA
HARRISBURG, Pa. (June 2) – The Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission (PFBC) today announced that it has launched an “S.O.S. - Save Our Susquehanna!” campaign to fund water and soil conservation projects along the Susquehanna River, whose young smallmouth bass population has been plagued over the last decade by illness and elevated mortality rates.
“The Susquehanna River is sick and someone has to take steps to fix it before it is too late,” said PFBC Executive Director John Arway. “This is about conservation and protecting our aquatic resources so they may be enjoyed by future generations as guaranteed by our state constitution. We need leadership to begin working on fixing problems that we know exist.”

“The PFBC’s very mission of Resource First requires us to step up our efforts to help our smallmouth fishery before it’s too late,” he added. “The time for action is now. This campaign will help fund projects to reduce known sources of pollution in critical areas where diseased bass have been found.”

Examples of some projects include:

Identifying sites and working with willing farmers and colleges and universities to test soils and reduce nutrient and sediment run-off to control nuisance algae blooms that produce low oxygen levels and high pH conditions that are harmful to young bass; and
Working with physicians and hospitals throughout the basin to keep pharmaceutical drugs and other endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) out of the river because of the harmful effects that they cause to fish.
From now until the end of the year, the PFBC expects to receive $3 million in revenue from sales of approximately 130,000 resident annual, senior resident annual, and non-resident annual licenses. Under the S.O.S. - Save Our Susquehanna! campaign, once the $3 million threshold is met, all additional sales from the three licenses will be dedicated solely to funding Susquehanna River projects.

“To kick off the campaign, we are pledging $50,000 in matching funds from the Commission,” Arway said. “I’m optimistic that we will raise and exceed the $50,000 from anglers, other conservationists, and anyone who cares about our natural resources and supports our efforts to do everything in our power to protect and conserve them.”

“Once we raise $50,000, the S.O.S. - Save Our Susquehanna! campaign will have its first $100,000 to begin working on projects to fix the river,” he added.

The campaign coincides with the upcoming start of bass season on June 13.

“Bass fishing is about to start, and memories of what bass fishing used to be like on the Susquehanna are on the minds of all anglers,” Arway said. “By announcing the campaign now, we hope that our avid anglers will share the news with colleagues and friends who may not fish, but care about the river and will want to contribute to help save it.”

Arway added that anyone can contribute to the campaign by purchasing a fishing license.

“The fishing license is simply the mechanism we’re using to raise the funds,” he said. “You don’t have to be an angler. You just have to care about the Susquehanna River. By buying an annual fishing license, you can help make this campaign a success.”

Arway added that by supporting this campaign, individuals can also help the Chesapeake Bay, which is fed by the Susquehanna River. “If you care about the Chesapeake Bay, buy a Pennsylvania fishing license to help us fix the river, which will also help to ‘Save the Bay.’”

A resident annual fishing license is $20; senior resident annual $9; and non-resident annual $50.

Save Our Susquehanna buttonAlso, individuals can further demonstrate their support by purchasing a special S.O.S. - Save Our Susquehanna button for just $10. A fishing license is required in order to purchase the button and all proceeds from the button sales will also go to fund the campaign. Buttons will be available to purchase on June 8.

Arway added that anglers and individuals also have the option of contributing to the campaign by writing a check to “S.O.S. – Save Our Susquehanna” and mailing it to the PFBC headquarters at P.O. Box 67000, Harrisburg, PA 17106.

Fishing licenses and buttons can be purchased online through the PFBC’s Outdoor Shop or at any of 900 licensing agents across the Commonwealth.

“Help us help the river,” Arway added. “The smallmouth bass need your support today.”

Media Contact
Eric Levis, Press Secretary
717.705.7806
elevis@pa.gov


Link to source: http://www.fish.state.pa.us/news/2015pr/sos-bass.htm
 
With the money going directly to SOS ill buy a button. Sounds like a plan and a good one as long as they get over the 3 million threshold.
 
Thanks for letting me know about this. I just bought mine and i'm going to encourage everyone else i know to buy one too. It's good to see some real action being taken for the Sus Q.
 
Where are you DEP? Why can't you list it as impaired or worse? Easier for your coffers to allow the perps (IF they are caught..) to pay the fines and continue to pollute. Shaking my head
 
I'll buy one.

Maybe they need a Save our PA Fish Comm button too. Or a Save our Wild Trout button. I'd buy one.
 
Seems more like a buy a license gimmick than save the Susky Campaign. Because one can not contribute without purchasing a license
 
Check paragraph 16.
 
I don't know if it is my cell phone but I cannot find the SOS button in the outdoor shop.
 
Interesting...the first thing that jumped out at me is this:

"Identifying sites and working with willing farmers and colleges..."

What if there are very few "willing" farmers? And can the Commission do anything to compel the farmers to become willing.

 
Go to Fish Comm website and look for the BUY A LICENSE section....that's where the buttons are.
 
BelAir, our local county conservation district works with landowners and farmers alike on riparian buffers, grants, plans etc. I'm not sure what the fish comm would do differently. I think it's a great idea, and funding is always a bottleneck in getting this kind of work done. So maybe they would be a state level grant program for high risk properties?
 
I believe it is a challenge to work with the Plain sect on these issues i.e. riparian buffers, etc.
 
Here's an article in from the paper, a doom and gloom read.

http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/feds-pennsylvania-substantially-off-track-in-chesapeake-bay-cleanup-efforts/article_83c9b184-1396-11e5-8f90-cfd1dc6a8f18.html

Unfortunately, no one recognizes or rather mentions the leaps and bounds of improvement that have been made since our conservation district was created over 50 years ago.

McSneek, yes, I believe it is a challenge, but not impossible to work with the plain sect. The article does say: "Also, EPA acknowledged that Pennsylvania may be correct in its complaint that efforts of many farmers, particularly Plain Sect farmers, for such practices as no-till farming and planting of cover crops, were not counted in computer modeling of Pennsylvania’s efforts to clean up the Bay."
I know factually, great efforts have gone in to the plain sect farmers in Lancaster county with much headway, but apparently their improvements are not calculated for these numbers.

Doom and gloom! I'm not against reporting motivating stories that make environmental change, but lets report the facts! What do the numbers look like when a computer uses all factors to calculate the improvement rates.
 
McSneek,
If you need a specific example of what Slay is speaking about in Lancaster Co, one only needs to look at the Pequea-Mill Creek Project that was started by NRCS well over a decade ago on Muddy Run, trib to Mill Ck and then continued by the Mill Ck Preservation Association. The has been much progress made in the Mill Ck drainage with various riparian enhancements that are clearly visible.
Very large amounts of enhancements have quietly (what would one expect?) occurred for two decades and their work continues.
 
Mike wrote:
McSneek,
If you need a specific example of what Slay is speaking about in Lancaster Co, one only needs to look at the Pequea-Mill Creek Project that was started by NRCS well over a decade ago on Muddy Run, trib to Mill Ck and then continued by the Mill Ck Preservation Association.

^+1. There have been many great strides in conservation efforts made along this drainage due to the above mentioned project over many years. Many of these enhancements have taken place on active and functioning Amish farms in one of the most agricultural drainage basins in SE PA. When I think back to what these areas looked like and the farming practices being used back in the mid 70's there is just a world of difference. It doesn't get much publicity, but it's out there.
 
Have only lived in Lancaster County since 1991. I am very close to the Conestoga and see it and the surrounding area almost daily. Lack of riparian buffers, unnecessary dams and livestock in streams are all common. No doubt there has been progress made through a lot of effort but there is more that could be done.
 
McSneek wrote:
No doubt there has been progress made through a lot of effort but there is more that could be done.

You are absolutely right! I will never argue against the point that there is plenty more that could be done.
 
Back
Top