Register now on PaFlyFish.com! Login
HOME FORUM BLOG PHOTOS LINKS


Sponsors

Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users



(1) 2 3 4 ... 12 »


PFBC Meeting

Joined:
2009/10/11 21:04
From Southeastern Pa
Posts: 197
Offline
tomorrow will be the PFBC quarterly meeting where the commission will be listening to public comment about proposed rule and regulation changes. I will be there with a group from our TU chapter and I will also be delivering comment from the Chesapeake council of the IFFF.

If you can make it out please do. the meeting begins at 2pm in the susquehanna room.

here is an interesting article from the post gazette on one of the issues being commented on:

http://www.post-gazette.com/sports/ou ... acts/stories/201501180140

Posted on: 2015/1/20 15:37


Re: PFBC Meeting

Joined:
2014/6/18 20:59
Posts: 1632
Offline
First, Susquehanna room where?

Second, during work hours so I have no chance of making it. I know it has nothing to do with this topic but can you ask them 2 questions?

1. What's going on with these tailwater projects
2. Why don't they reply to emails submitted

Posted on: 2015/1/20 16:11
_________________
Deadbeat Hero


Re: PFBC Meeting

Joined:
2010/6/26 11:19
From Along the Lehigh Above the Gap
Posts: 132
Offline
Quote:

krayfish2

1. What's going on with these tailwater projects


Well they are going to keep stocking the Po. There is your tailwater initiative. Lol

Posted on: 2015/1/20 16:54
_________________
“My mom is being eaten by a dog and there’s nothing I can do!”


Re: PFBC Meeting

Joined:
2006/11/2 8:50
Posts: 1429
Online
The Post-Gazette article tries to link 2 totally unrelated topics:

1) The designation of those 9 streams as Class A, but continuing to stock them, and the related proposal to allow other Class A streams to be stocked in the future, with just the approval of the ED and Commissioners.

2) The surveying of previously un-assessed waters, particularly in the Marcellus shale region, to see if they have wild trout populations.


From the article:
-------------------------------------------------------
At least three of the 10 streams PFBC is considering for Class A designation lie outside the perimeter of the Marcellus Shale formation in central and northern Pennsylvania, a fact that may have made PFBC willing to absorb the criticism it attracted in the no-stocking turmoil that accompanied the proposed Class A designations.

"Since the inception of shale gas development, we've seen activity with the potential to impact wild trout resources in remote areas and on a scale we'd never seen before," said John Arway, Fish and Boat Commission executive director. "The Marcellus industry has advocated that we assess trout streams where they might operate and know what's there so they can design their activities around what we need to protect."
------------------------------------------------------------

This is written as if there is some connection between the topics. But there isn't any. They are two totally separate topics.

So if you are planning to talk at the meeting, don't be confused by that article. Don't start mixing in talk about the unassessed waters program and Marcellus stuff with the Class A proposals.



Posted on: 2015/1/20 19:35


Re: PFBC Meeting

Joined:
2009/10/11 21:04
From Southeastern Pa
Posts: 197
Offline
not to sound smart but if there is a currently stocked stream in the marcellus region that currently has the equivalent of a class A wild trout population that the PFBC is unaware of, would that not be considered un-assessed? are we strictly talking about waters that have never been assessed for wild trout pop or never assessed ever?

also, does anybody else find assessed to be a funny word? how many freakin ss's doe you need!?...seessssh

Posted on: 2015/1/21 2:11
_________________
Invictus Maneo www.keystoneflyguides.com


Re: PFBC Meeting

Joined:
2009/10/11 21:04
From Southeastern Pa
Posts: 197
Offline
so after I read the IFFF statement I hope I can get back up to read my personal testimony. if not and I get kicked out here's what I would have said:

***

Thank you for hearing my comments today. My story into angling in Pennsylvania starts not unlike many others in that my grandfather would take my brother and I along with our uncles out to his special spot on his favorite trout stream.

The little Conestoga (as I am sure you are aware) is a well-known stocked trout fishery in Lancaster county that is not capable of sustaining year round populations of trout for various reasons. I remember my grandfather’s excitement, as we would head out on opening weekend. It was an excitement that I never learned to share, as it was my annual experience that it was a bunch of grumpy old men throwing corn and worms at the same pod of scared fish. If this was fishing, I wanted no parts of it.

It was not until my early twenties that I fell in love with fishing and understood why my grandfather loved it so much as well. It was at that time that my best friend taught me fly fishing on some of our state’s famous DHALO and special regulation waters including Lititz Run, Donegal Spring Run, Tulpehocken Creek, Kettle Creek and Pine Creek. My experiences on these waters showed me the true potential fishing has to offer in our state. It wasn’t a crowded bank lined with fat dudes in folding chairs and stringers, it was endless miles of water all to myself to lose myself in. It changed me from the common man to an uncommon man as I understood the value of fishing and our commonwealth’s potential. Years later my mother would tell me how proud my Pap would be if he knew I took up fly-fishing. Many of the waters I went to all around the state with my best friend were also waters he loved. I know now why.

I urge you to carefully re-evaluate the proposed changes to the DHALO regulations. Degrading the current standards will only serve to depreciate these special areas and will reduce the positive impact and reach these legendary waters already have here and abroad. By moving our state forward towards more conservative and practical management strategies such as the DHALO program we can fully recognize the potential of our great cold-water resource.

The special regulations this commonwealth has pioneered changed me from the modern day common man who could have cared less about fishing into the uncommon man who now stands before you as not only an angler but also a licensed guide (imagine that!) and now advocates for their protection.

Thank you for your time and consideration.


***

The only reason I threw in that bit at the end is because it still amazes me that I went from a kid who could have cared less about fishing to a dude that wants to share it with others. not tooting my own horn, tooting our state horn because we really do have some awesome water that is worth protecting.

Posted on: 2015/1/21 2:17
_________________
Invictus Maneo www.keystoneflyguides.com


Re: PFBC Meeting

Joined:
2006/11/2 8:50
Posts: 1429
Online
Quote:

TimRobinsin wrote:

are we strictly talking about waters that have never been assessed for wild trout pop or never assessed ever?


Yes. The un-assessed waters initiative is all about surveying streams that have never been surveyed before, to determine if the streams support a wild trout population or not.

Posted on: 2015/1/21 8:44


Re: PFBC Meeting

Joined:
2009/10/11 21:04
From Southeastern Pa
Posts: 197
Offline
thanks D. I get confused easily

Posted on: 2015/1/21 9:51
_________________
Invictus Maneo www.keystoneflyguides.com


Re: PFBC Meeting

Joined:
2009/10/11 21:04
From Southeastern Pa
Posts: 197
Offline
I revised it:

Derek Eberly
Keystone Fly Guides


Thank you for hearing my comments today. My story into angling in Pennsylvania starts not unlike many others in that my grandfather would take my brother and I along with our uncles out to his special spot on his favorite trout stream.

The little Conestoga (as I am sure you are aware) is a well-known stocked trout fishery in Lancaster county that is not capable of sustaining year round populations of trout for various reasons. I remember my grandfather’s excitement, as we would head out on opening weekend. It was an excitement that I never learned to share, as it was my annual experience that it was a bunch of grumpy old men throwing corn and worms at the same pod of scared fish. If this was fishing, I wanted no parts of it.

It was not until my early twenties that I fell in love with fishing and understood why my grandfather loved it so much as well. It was at that time that my best friend taught me fly fishing on some of our state’s famous DHALO and special regulation waters including Lititz Run, Donegal Spring Run, Tulpehocken Creek, Kettle Creek and Pine Creek. My experiences on these waters showed me the true potential fishing has to offer in our state. It wasn’t a crowded bank lined with dudes, folding chairs and stringers. It was endless miles of un-crowded/uncommon water to lose myself in. It changed me from the common man to an uncommon man, as I understood the value of fishing and our commonwealth’s potential. Years later my mother would tell me how proud my Pap would be if he knew I took up fly-fishing. Many of the waters I went to all around the state with my best friend were also waters he loved. I know now why.

I urge you to carefully re-evaluate the proposed changes to the DHALO regulations. Degrading the current standards will only serve to depreciate these special areas and will reduce the positive impact and reach these legendary waters already have here and abroad. By moving our state forward towards more conservative and practical management strategies such as the DHALO program we can fully recognize the potential of our great cold-water resource.

The special regulations this commonwealth has pioneered changed me from the modern day common man who could have cared less about fishing into the uncommon man who now stands before you as not only an angler but also a licensed guide (imagine that!) and now advocates for their protection.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Posted on: 2015/1/21 10:02
_________________
Invictus Maneo www.keystoneflyguides.com


Re: PFBC Meeting

Joined:
2006/11/2 8:50
Posts: 1429
Online
IMHO, keep it very concise (short). And keep it very much on topic, to the point.

They're proposing changes to the DH areas. That's the topic, stick to it.

Since you are against the proposed changes, your job is to convince them that the proposed changes will have negative results, and that the current rules are better and should be kept.

Explain how the current rules are creating good fishing for lots of happy anglers. And how the proposed changes might damage that situation. Explain what negative effects you expect to occur from the proposed changes.

That's it. Cut out everything else. Cut out the life story stuff, it's off topic. And eliminate any suggestion that flyfishers are better than other fishermen.









Posted on: 2015/1/21 10:53


Re: PFBC Meeting

Joined:
2009/10/11 21:04
From Southeastern Pa
Posts: 197
Offline
I thought the life story demonstrated the importance of DHALO. I never would have gotten into this sport if it were not for special regs. who wants to fish open water? that was the point I guess I failed to make.

Special regs may get more people back into fishing. the kind of people who think of fishing with the same stigma that I did.

then again, what do I know, just a dumb kid from the suburbs

Posted on: 2015/1/21 12:36
_________________
Invictus Maneo www.keystoneflyguides.com


Re: PFBC Meeting

Joined:
2006/11/2 8:50
Posts: 1429
Online
They are not proposing eliminating DH areas or other special regs areas. They are proposing certain changes to DH areas.

So, you have to convince them that those changes will cause harmful outcomes that outweigh whatever gains they hope to achieve.

You have to be very specific, giving details on what negative things you expect to happen if the proposed changes are passed.

Posted on: 2015/1/21 13:21


Re: PFBC Meeting

Joined:
2007/1/30 10:05
From Jersey Shore, PA
Posts: 85
Offline
Derek:

Dwight has provided you very good advice.

Briefly relate why you value the regs. and then explain why you feel the proposed changes would have a negative impact.

Be aware that your revealing you are a fly fishing guide may give the (erroneous, we hope) impression you have an ulterior (translate selfish) motive for your opposition to the proposed changes. Some folks assume that the mere fact that you are a ff'er you have a "holier than thou" attitude. It''s just a fact of life.

I found a long time ago that the less attention you draw to the "me" the better off you'll be.

Posted on: 2015/1/21 16:05


Re: PFBC Meeting

Joined:
2011/4/12 17:23
From Lancaster Co.
Posts: 664
Offline
Tim aka Derek - Some constructive criticism first:

1. I would have left it as fat dudes.

2. Lititz Run is famous? Maybe I better walk over there and fish it one of these days.

All kidding aside, I'm right with you in terms of how you define "value" in your present day fishing experiences. I fear though that the "utilization-minded" PFBC still sees that bank lined with dudes in lawn chairs (all shapes and sizes) as what they're here to provide to the angling public.

Posted on: 2015/1/21 16:08
_________________
"You might be a big fish, in a little pond. Doesn't mean you've won, cause a long may come, a bigger one."


Re: PFBC Meeting

Joined:
2006/9/13 10:18
From LV
Posts: 595
Offline
The article is inaccurate, PFBC never proposed to stop stocking the 10 designated streams. What they proposed, based on angler surveys was to stock these streams once a season, either once pre-season with adult trout, or some other method. I thought at the time the measure was a compromise, given the usage of those streams, they are all in the 75 percentile of stream usage.
The importance of the Class A status is a big deal, it give a much higher protection of use to streams classified thus.
I just wish the people that write this stuff actually got things right, whatever happened to the idea of a editor or someone else checking the facts.

Posted on: 2015/1/21 17:33



(1) 2 3 4 ... 12 »



You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]





Site Content
Login
Sponsors
Stay Connected

twitterfeed.com facebook instagram RSS Feed

USGS Water Levels
Polls
Angling Trade E-Survey: How Many Outdoor Print Magazines Do You Subscribe To?
None. Nada. Zip. 50% (46)
One or two. 32% (30)
Three or four. 13% (12)
More than four. 3% (3)
_PL_TOTALVOTES
The poll closed at 2017/10/27 11:42
Comments?





Copyright 2017 by PaFlyFish.com | Privacy Policy| Provided by Kile Media Group | Design by 7dana.com