foxtrapper1972 wrote:
Sal- I wonder the same. Land has been closed in the past year around Safe Harbor. It was open to the public for my entire life. Safe Harbor Village was sold to a group called Safe Harbor Partners who immediately shut down all lands attached to the village. Also MILES of land from Safe Harbor to Shenks Ferry now has been closed. I've heard rumors of even more areas to be shut down. Apparently the people running this new company are a real bunch of bastards. I was just "trespassing" last evening and I plan to continue doing so.
It's less than 2 miles from Safe Harbor to Shenks Ferry.. Just sayin..
Whether you like private property or not, if you deliberately trespass, you give anglers a bad name. And whether privately held property has been open for hundreds of years but tomorrow becomes posted by a private landowner, that is the private landowners prerogative. So in terms of property rights, there's nothing to see here. Talen can do what it wants. Safe Harbor Partners can do what it wants (but I'm glad I got to explore the quarry back there before it changed ownership hands).
From what I can see, the land that Brookfield holds is mostly buffering land that was already posted (i.e. the stuff right around the dams and it was closed when PPL owned it). So I'm not sure what land you are referring to that is lost because of Brookfield.
From a PR perspective, it's a complete boneheaded move for Talen. Their argument is weak and sounds like some overly risk-adverse attorney turned marketing spokesperson crafted it (but that's not to say that there isn't some risk for them to open Holtwood Park to the public). The Conestoga Trail is maintained by volunteers, and probably the ball diamond in the park, if it is used by a Little League team, is maintained by the parents and coaches of the kids. There's a couple of pavilions, maybe a swing set, some Porta-Potties, and maybe a bathroom. Maintenance of the whole shebang probably costs as much as the bottled water served at a catered luncheon at a Talen shareholders' meeting.
I'd have no problems with Lancaster County Conservancy buying the woodland, but I think they should steer clear of holding parkland (pavilions, bathrooms, playgrounds), as that is a bit of mission creep. Lancaster County or Martic Township could be logical holders of the parkland proper.