Register now on! Login


Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users

« 1 2 3 4 (5)

Re: Rod Size on small streams

2014/1/6 9:36
From Montgomery, PA
Posts: 40
well duh how else do you think he gets pictures of browns when they aren't biting? lol

Posted on: 2014/1/30 7:43

Re: Rod Size on small streams

2006/9/13 22:36
From Tioga co. formerly of bucks co.
Posts: 346
If I am in a situation where the rod is to long (7'6") I'll use only the tip section to cast. that being said for most small streams I use from 5'2" to 7'6" rods. (yes squashy that's a 5'2" fenwick 5 wt)

Posted on: 2014/1/30 11:22

So many Fish, So little time !!!
from the outer edge of nowhere
fly tying and fishing ghillie..

Re: Rod Size on small streams

2009/7/29 10:25
Posts: 249
k-bob wrote:
"tb, two is better than one, right. wouldn't three be better than two? if you could select three fly rods for PA streams, would two of the three be the same model and same length?"

tb: "And 4 is better than 3, and 5 is better than 4 etc.

One time a flyfisher told me he owned 92 fly rods. He should be ready for nearly all situations."

I own ten rods, but do 90% of fishing with four of them. 92 may be overkill. three or four, not so much ? :)

Posted on: 2014/1/30 14:44

Re: Rod Size on small streams

2006/11/2 8:50
Posts: 1653
I don't consider 3 or 4 overkill, or 13 or 14 for that matter.

I didn't mean that having a bunch of fly rods is a bad thing.

I meant that you can fish any trout stream in PA quite effectively with those 2 rods. It's a good thing for people starting out, and/or people on a budget, to know.

A lot of speciality rods are discussed, and that may give some beginners the impression that those rods are needed for particular types of fishing.

Posted on: 2014/1/30 15:51

Edited by troutbert on 2014/1/30 16:10:03
Edited by troutbert on 2014/1/30 16:14:54

Re: Rod Size on small streams

2010/6/9 12:35
From down the block from the Letort.
Posts: 417
I agree with troutbert on his goto 2 rod quiver, and if I could only have one (perish the thought!) it would be a 7'6"/5wt. Plenty of oomph to reach out and handle heavier rigs, but not so long as to be unusable in tighter quarters.

But luckily, we don't have those restraints, so I'm more than happy with my quiver of a dozen plus rods, which seems to grow a little bit every year.

Posted on: 2014/1/30 17:03

Re: Rod Size on small streams

2009/6/17 21:49
From New Bloomfield
Posts: 11
Agreed. My first real fly rod was a 7"6' 5 wt. That rod served me well as a do all rod for many years till I could afford another. For a two rod quiver in this state a 7 to 7.5 4 wt. and a 9' 5 wt. I love fly rods and it's a good thing they don't have breasts.

Posted on: 2014/1/30 20:25
I am of the opinion that there is NOT one single population of wild trout that exists in our great state worth intentionally degrading for the benefit of any fisherman or any amount of money no matter how small the population.

Re: Rod Size on small streams

2014/1/31 7:40
From Along a small stream
Posts: 0
I have narrowed it down to a few rods.

I use a Cabelas TQR 5ft 2wt
An Orvis Superfine 6ft 4wt
Orvis Superfine 7ft 5wt
And what I believe to be the best I've used, a TFO Signature 6ft 2wt.

Brk Trt

Posted on: 2014/1/31 20:05

« 1 2 3 4 (5)

You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]

Site Content
Stay Connected facebook instagram RSS Feed

USGS Water Levels
The New Keystone Fly Fishing Book
Where do you most want to fly fish outside the region?
Western US 39% (31)
Alaska 10% (8)
New Zealand 32% (26)
Florida Keys 3% (3)
South America 6% (5)
Elsewhere 7% (6)
The poll closed at 2018/3/17 12:44

Copyright 2018 by | Privacy Policy| Provided by Kile Media Group | Design by