Register now on! Login


Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users

« 1 2 3 4 (5)

Re: Fly Line Preferences

2008/1/31 17:19
From Pretty much everywhere at some point, Thorndale today.
Posts: 2344

The article tells the truth. Therefore, it's a good article. As in anything, the reader has to take the info and apply it to their own situation.

As far as which way the article switches people, regardless of how it's written, it's a pure numbers game.

1. There are far more people using WF than DT.
2. Beginners usually start with WF, and thus there are far more using WF due to false assumptions than those using DT due to false assumptions.

Thus, since there's nothing false in there, lets assume that a certain % of readers are switching one way or the other due to correcting misconceptions. If those %'s are even in the same ballpark, then far more people are switching from WF to DT, because there's so many more to switch.

I think it's almost certain that the article switched more people to DT. How many people bought the marketing that WF is better, then read the article and say "wow, I never fish beyond 40'"? The article tells the truth, and truth is the enemy of fancy marketing.

Posted on: 2012/6/20 8:18

Re: Fly Line Preferences

2006/9/11 16:20
Posts: 14
I like Terenzio DT silk line starting from spring through fall. Winter fishing is mainly a Wulff triangle long belly line. For bass and panfish, a Wulff bass line punches the ticket.....

Posted on: 2012/6/20 16:45

« 1 2 3 4 (5)

You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]

Site Content
Stay Connected facebook instagram RSS Feed

USGS Water Levels

Copyright 2017 by | Privacy Policy| Provided by Kile Media Group | Design by