Register now on! Login


Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users

« 1 2 3 4 (5) 6 »

Re: Oil Spill in the Gulf.

2010/1/27 16:05
From cool, dark, damp crevices
Posts: 14
Osprey, you're never too old for good information. ;) Just like every other news site, one must wade through some BS to obtain the important info. Last week, hubby informed me of an impending tsunami as a result of the oil spill. Since I hadn't heard of such an event, I decided to check the reference,, a conspiracy theory site <---from my perspective. Lacking any sufficient science (for me) to support the Rense claim, I felt it necessary to check the information myself. Erosion is plausible; there is more going on under the Gulf floor.

Pcray, it is a good site, highly technical, but informative, nonetheless...if one doesn't mind a LOT of reading. ;) You still encounter trolls, or folks who completely side one way or another. But realistically, it's nice to know you can find researched facts and informed opinions to develop a firm understanding of a pending issue.

Posted on: 2010/6/21 10:37

Re: Oil Spill in the Gulf.

2009/4/1 21:52
From Johnstown, PA
Posts: 4469
fruitingbodies......i agree is what i would call a conspiracy theory website , but not Coast to Coast , although they do run their share of off the wall subjects , like bigfoot and aliens/UFO stuff , more often than not the subject matter is very serious science backed testimony and interviews with credible people who work or have worked in the field of discussion , in the case i'm talking about it was an ex military fellow who had headed up the ecological division of the military and he insisted that the military had the means and equipment to fix the leak , they lacked permission and were reluctant to assume liability , apparantly as soon as they would so much as touch that well , liability would switch from BP to the military. But i agree with bikerfish , in that it's time for action and not further discussion , if our military has the means then they should proceed regardless.

Posted on: 2010/6/21 18:16

Re: Oil Spill in the Gulf.

2008/1/31 17:19
From Pretty much everywhere at some point, Thorndale today.
Posts: 14384

That is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. No offense or anything. But you're saying the military has more equipment to work on deep oil infrastructure than a deep oil driller? Come on man! The only way thats true is if explosives will stop the leak, which was discussed and dismissed (i.e. more likely to open up a bigger leak). Beyond that, bigfoot and aliens are actually more credible.

There are crazies in every group, including the military and big oil. Just because a website excels at finding the credible sounding crazy guy doesn't make it real. If the BP, the military, etc. if any of them had the means to end this quickly, it would have been done long ago.

The situation is terrible, I agree. But all the wishful thinking in the world won't help a thing. And things are really out of whack when we then pass out more blame for people failing to live up to our wishful thinking.

Posted on: 2010/6/22 8:20

Re: Oil Spill in the Gulf.

2007/1/2 11:55
From Bozeman
Posts: 19931
I have no idea whether this guy is legit or not, but this is a scary set of thoughts.

OK let's get real about the GOM oil flow. There doesn't really seem to be much info on TOD that furthers more complete understanding of what's really happening in the GOM.
As you have probably seen and maybe feel yourselves, there are several things that do not appear to make sense regarding the actions of attack against the well. Don't feel bad, there is much that doesn't make sense even to professionals unless you take into account some important variables that we are not being told about. There seems to me to be a reluctance to face what cannot be termed anything less than grim circumstances in my opinion. There certainly is a reluctance to inform us regular people and all we have really gotten is a few dots here and there...

First of all...set aside all your thoughts of plugging the well and stopping it from blowing out oil using any method from the top down. Plugs, big valves to just shut it off, pinching the pipe closed, installing a new bop or lmrp, shooting any epoxy in it, top kills with mud etc etc etc....forget that, it won't be's done and over. In fact actually opening up the well at the subsea source and allowing it to gush more is not only exactly what has happened, it was probably necessary, or so they think anyway.

So you have to ask WHY? Why make it worse?...there really can only be one answer and that answer does not bode well for all of us. It's really an inescapable conclusion at this point, unless you want to believe that every Oil and Gas professional involved suddenly just forgot everything they know or woke up one morning and drank a few big cups of stupid and got assigned to directing the response to this catastrophe. Nothing makes sense unless you take this into account, but after you will see the "sense" behind what has happened and what is happening. That conclusion is this:

The well bore structure is compromised "Down hole".

That is something which is a "Worst nightmare" conclusion to reach. While many have been saying this for some time as with any complex disaster of this proportion many have "said" a lot of things with no real sound reasons or evidence for jumping to such conclusions, well this time it appears that they may have jumped into the right place...

This was probably our best and only chance to kill this well from the top down. This "kill mud" is a tried and true method of killing wells and usually has a very good chance of success. The depth of this well presented some logistical challenges, but it really should not of presented any functional obstructions. The pumping capacity was there and it would have worked, should have worked, but it didn't.

It didn't work, but it did create evidence of what is really happening. First of all the method used in this particular top kill made no sense, did not follow the standard operating procedure used to kill many other wells and in fact for the most part was completely contrary to the procedure which would have given it any real chance of working.

When a well is "Killed" using this method heavy drill fluid "Mud" is pumped at high volume and pressure into a leaking well. The leaks are "behind" the point of access where the mud is fired in, in this case the "choke and Kill lines" which are at the very bottom of the BOP (Blow Out Preventer) The heavy fluid gathers in the "behind" portion of the leaking well assembly, while some will leak out, it very quickly overtakes the flow of oil and only the heavier mud will leak out. Once that "solid" flow of mud is established at the leak "behind" the well, the mud pumps increase pressure and begin to overtake the pressure of the oil deposit. The mud is established in a solid column that is driven downward by the now stronger pumps. The heavy mud will create a solid column that is so heavy that the oil deposit can no longer push it up, shut off the pumps...the well is can no longer flow.

Usually this will happen fairly quickly, in fact for it to work at must happen quickly. There is no "trickle some mud in" because that is not how a top kill works. The flowing oil will just flush out the trickle and a solid column will never be established. Yet what we were told was "It will take days to know whether it
worked"...."Top kill might take 48 hours to complete"...the only way it could take days is if BP intended to do some "test fires" to test integrity of the entire system. The actual "kill" can only take hours by nature because it must happen fairly rapidly. It also increases strain on the "behind" portion and in this instance we all know that what remained was fragile at best.

Early that afternoon we saw a massive flow burst out of the riser "plume" area. This was the first test fire of high pressure mud injection. Later on same day we saw a greatly increased flow out of the kink leaks, this was mostly mud at that time as the kill mud is tanish color due to the high amount of Barite which is added to it to weight it and Barite is a white powder.

We later learned the pumping was shut down at midnight, we weren't told about that until almost 16 hours later, but by then...I'm sure BP had learned the worst. The mud they were pumping in was not only leaking out the "behind" was leaking out of someplace forward...and since they were not even near being able to pump mud into the deposit itself, because the well would be dead long before...and the oil was still coming up, there could only be one conclusion...the wells casings were ruptured and it was leaking "down hole"

They tried the "Junk shot"...the "bridging materials" which also failed and likely made things worse in regards to the ruptured well casings.

"Despite successfully pumping a total of over 30,000 barrels of heavy mud, in three attempts at rates of up to
80 barrels a minute, and deploying a wide range of different bridging materials, the operation did not overcome the flow from the well." ... 2012968&contentId=7062487

80 Barrels per minute is over 200,000 gallons per hour, over 115,000 barrels per day...did we seen an increase over and above what was already leaking out of 115k bpd?....we did would have been a massive increase in order of multiples and this did not happen.

"The whole purpose is to get the kill mud down,” said Wells. “We'll have 50,000 barrels of mud on hand to kill this well. It's far more than necessary, but we always like to have backup."

Try finding THAT quote's been's a cached copy of a quote... ... +to+get+the+kill+mud+down,%E2%80%9D+said+Wells.+%E2%80%9CWe'll+have+50,000+barrels+of+mud+on+hand+to+kill+this+well.+It's+far+more+than+necessary,+but+we+always+like+to+have+backup.%E2%80%9D&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

"The "top kill" effort, launched Wednesday afternoon by industry and government engineers, had pumped enough drilling fluid to block oil and gas spewing from the well, Allen said. The pressure from the well was very low, he said, but persisting."

"Allen said one ship that was pumping fluid into the well had run out of the fluid, or "mud," and that a second ship was on the way. He said he was encouraged by the progress."

Later we found out that Allen had no idea what was really going on and had been "Unavailable all day" ... 05/27/interview_with_coas...

So what we had was BP running out of 50,000 barrels of mud in a very short period of time. An amount far and above what they deemed necessary to kill the well. Shutting down pumping 16 hours before telling anyone, including the president. We were never really given a clear reason why "Top Kill" failed, just that it couldn't overcome the well.

There is only one article anywhere that says anything else about it at this time of writing...and it's a relatively obscure article from the wall street journal "online" citing an unnamed source.

"WASHINGTON—BP PLC has concluded that its "top-kill" attempt last week to seal its broken well in the Gulf of
Mexico may have failed due to a malfunctioning disk inside the well about 1,000 feet below the ocean floor.

The disk, part of the subsea safety infrastructure, may have ruptured during the surge of oil and gas up the well on April 20 that led to the explosion aboard the Deepwater Horizon rig, BP officials said. The rig sank two days later, triggering a leak that has since become the worst in U.S. history.

The broken disk may have prevented the heavy drilling mud injected into the well last week from getting far enough down the well to overcome the pressure from the escaping oil and gas, people familiar with BP's findings said. They said much of the drilling mud may also have escaped from the well into the rock formation outside the wellbore.

As a result, BP wasn't able to get sufficient pressure to keep the oil and gas at bay. If they had been able to build up sufficient pressure, the company had hoped to pump in cement and seal off the well. The effort was deemed a failure on Saturday.

BP started the top-kill effort Wednesday afternoon, shooting heavy drilling fluids into the broken valve known as a blowout preventer. The mud was driven by a 30,000 horsepower pump installed on a ship at the surface. But it was clear from the start that a lot of the "kill mud" was leaking out instead of going down into the well." ... 0487560457528013357716426...

There are some inconsistencies with this article.
There are no "Disks" or "Subsea safety structure" 1,000 feet below the sea floor, all that is there is well bore. There is nothing that can allow the mud or oil to "escape" into the rock formation outside the well bore except the well, because it is the only thing there.

All the actions and few tid bits of information all lead to one inescapable conclusion. The well pipes below the sea floor are broken and leaking. Now you have some real data of how BP's actions are evidence of that, as well as some murky statement from "BP officials" confirming the same.

I took some time to go into a bit of detail concerning the failure of Top Kill because this was a significant event. To those of us outside the real inside loop, yet still fairly knowledgeable, it was a major confirmation of what many feared. That the system below the sea floor has serious failures of varying magnitude in the complicated chain, and it is breaking down and it will continue to.

What does this mean?

It means they will never cap the gusher after the wellhead. They cannot...the more they try and restrict the oil gushing out the bop?...the more it will transfer to the leaks below. Just like a leaky garden hose with a nozzle on it. When you open up the nozzle? doesn't leak so bad, you close the nozzle? leaks real bad,
same dynamics. It is why they sawed the riser off...or tried to anyway...but they clipped it off, to relieve pressure on the leaks "down hole". I'm sure there was a bit of panic time after they crimp/pinched off the large riser pipe and the Diamond wire saw got stuck and failed...because that crimp diverted pressure and flow to the rupture down below.

Contrary to what most of us would think as logical to stop the oil mess, actually opening up the gushing well and making it gush more became direction BP took after confirming that there was a leak. In fact if you note their actions, that should become clear. They have shifted from stopping or restricting the gusher to opening it up and catching it. This only makes sense if they want to relieve pressure at the leak hidden down below the seabed.....and that sort of leak is one of the most dangerous and potentially damaging kind of leak there could be. It is also inaccessible which compounds our problems. There is no way to stop that leak from above, all they can do is relieve the pressure on it and the only way to do that right now is to open up the nozzle above and gush more oil into the gulf and hopefully catch it, which they have done, they just neglected to tell us why, gee thanks.

A down hole leak is dangerous and damaging for several reasons.
There will be erosion throughout the entire beat up, beat on and beat down remainder of the "system" including that inaccessible leak. The same erosion I spoke about in the first post is still present and has never stopped, cannot be stopped, is impossible to stop and will always be present in and acting on anything that is left which has crude oil "Product" rushing through it. There are abrasives still present, swirling flow will create hot spots of wear and this erosion is relentless and will always be present until eventually it wears away enough material to break it's way out. It will slowly eat the bop away especially at the now pinched off riser head and it will flow more and more. Perhaps BP can outrun or keep up with that out flow with various suckage methods for a period of time, but eventually the well will win that race, just how long that race will be? one really knows....However now?...there are other problems that a down hole leak will and must produce that will compound this already bad situation.

This down hole leak will undermine the foundation of the seabed in and around the well area. It also weakens the only thing holding up the massive Blow Out Preventer's immense bulk of 450 tons. In fact?...we are beginning to the results of the well's total integrity beginning to fail due to the undermining being caused by the leaking well bore.

The first layer of the sea floor in the gulf is mostly lose material of sand and silt. It doesn't hold up anything and isn't meant to, what holds the entire subsea system of the Bop in place is the well itself. The very large steel connectors of the initial well head "spud" stabbed in to the sea floor. The Bop literally sits on top of the pipe and never touches the sea bed, it wouldn't do anything in way of support if it did. After several tens of feet the seabed does begin to support the well connection laterally (side to side) you couldn't put a 450 ton piece of machinery on top of a 100' tall pipe "in the air" and subject it to the side loads caused by the ocean currents and expect it not to bend over...unless that pipe was very much larger than the machine itself, which you all can see it is not. The well's piping in comparison is actually very much smaller than the Blow Out Preventer and strong as it may be, it relies on some support from the seabed to function and not literally fall over...and it is now showing signs of doing just that....falling over.

If you have been watching the live feed cams you may have noticed that some of the ROVs are using an inclinometer...and inclinometer is an instrument that measures "Incline" or tilt. The BOP is not supposed to be tilting...and after the riser clip off operation it has begun to...

This is not the only problem that occurs due to erosion of the outer area of the well casings. The way a well casing assembly functions it that it is an assembly of different sized "tubes" that decrease in size as they go down. These tubes have a connection to each other that is not unlike a click or snap together locking action. After a certain length is assembled they are cemented around the ouside to the earth that the more rough drill hole is bored through in the well making process. A very well put together and simply explained process of "How to drill a deep water oil well" is available here:

The well bore casings rely on the support that is created by the cementing phase of well construction. Just like if you have many hands holding a pipe up you could put some weight on the top and the many hands could hold the pipe and the weight on top easily...but if there were no hands gripping and holding the pipe?...all the weight must be held up by the pipe alone. The series of connections between the sections of casings are not designed to hold up the immense weight of the BOP without all the "hands" that the cementing provides and they will eventually buckle and fail when stressed beyond their design limits.

These are clear and present dangers to the battered subsea safety structure (bop and lmrp) which is the only loose cork on this well we have left. The immediate (first 1,000 feet) of well structure that remains is now also undoubtedly compromised. bad as that is? is far from the only possible problems with this very problematic well. There were ongoing troubles with the entire process during the drilling of this well. There were also many comprises made by BP IMO which may have resulted in an overall weakened structure of the entire well system all the way to the bottom plug which is over 12,000 feet deep. Problems with the cementing procedure which was done by Haliburton and was deemed as “was against our best practices.” by a Haliburton employee on April 1st weeks before the well blew out. There is much more and I won't go into detail right now concerning the lower end of the well and the troubles encountered during the whole creation of this well and earlier "Well control" situations that were revieled in various internal BP e-mails. I will add several links to those documents and quotes from them below and for now, address the issues concerning the upper portion of the well and the region of the sea floor.

What is likely to happen now?

Well...none of what is likely to happen is good, in's about as bad as it gets. I am convinced the erosion and compromising of the entire system is accelerating and attacking more key structural areas of the well, the blow out preventer and surrounding strata holding it all up and together. This is evidenced by the tilt of the blow out preventer and the erosion which has exposed the well head connection. What eventually will happen is that the blow out preventer will literally tip over if they do not run supports to it as the currents push on it. I suspect they will run those supports as cables tied to anchors very soon, if they don't, they are inviting disaster that much sooner.

Eventually even that will be futile as the well casings cannot support the weight of the massive system above with out the cement bond to the earth and that bond is being eroded away. When enough is eroded away the casings will buckle and the BOP will collapse the well. If and when you begin to see oil and gas coming up around the well area from under the BOP? or the area around the well head connection and casing sinking more and more rapidly? won't be too long after that the entire system fails. BP must be aware of this, they are mapping the sea floor sonically and that is not a mere exercise. Our Gov't must be well aware too, they just are not telling us.

All of these things lead to only one place, a fully wide open well bore directly to the oil deposit...after that, it goes into the realm of "the worst things you can think of" The well may come completely apart as the inner liners fail. There is still a very long drill string in the well, that could literally come flying I said...all the worst things you can think of are a possibility, but the very least damaging outcome as bad as it is, is that we are stuck with a wide open gusher blowing out 150,000 barrels a day of raw oil or more. There isn't any "cap dome" or any other suck fixer device on earth that exists or could be built that will stop it from gushing out and doing more and more damage to the gulf. While at the same time also doing more damage to the well, making the chance of halting it with a kill from the bottom up less and less likely to work, which as it stands now? the only real chance we have left to stop it all.

It's a race now...a race to drill the relief wells and take our last chance at killing this monster before the whole weakened, wore out, blown out, leaking and failing system gives up it's last gasp in a horrific crescendo.

We are not even 2 months into it, barely half way by even optimistic estimates. The damage done by the leaked oil now is virtually immeasurable already and it will not get better, it can only get worse. No matter how much they can collect, there will still be thousands and thousands of gallons leaking out every minute, every hour of every day. We have 2 months left before the relief wells are even near in position and set up to take a kill shot and that is being optimistic as I said.

Over the next 2 months the mechanical situation also cannot improve, it can only get worse, getting better is an impossibility. While they may make some gains on collecting the leaked oil, the structural situation cannot heal itself. It will continue to erode and flow out more oil and eventually the inevitable collapse which cannot be stopped will happen. It is only a simple matter of who can "get there first" or the well.

We can only hope the race against that eventuality is one we can win, but my assessment I am sad to say is that we will not.

The system will collapse or fail substantially before we reach the finish line ahead of the well and the worst is yet to come.

Sorry to bring you that news, I know it is grim, but that is the way I see it....I sincerely hope I am wrong.

We need to prepare for the possibility of this blow out sending more oil into the gulf per week then what we already have now, because that is what a collapse of the system will cause. All the collection efforts that have captured oil will be erased in short order. The magnitude of this disaster will increase exponentially by the time we can do anything to halt it and our odds of actually even being able to halt it will go down.

The magnitude and impact of this disaster will eclipse anything we have known in our life times if the worst or even near worst happens...

We are seeing the puny forces of man vs the awesome forces of nature.
We are going to need some luck and a lot of effort to win...
and if nature decides we ought to lose, we will....

Reference materials:

On April 1, a job log written by a Halliburton employee, Marvin Volek, warns that BP’s use of cement “was
against our best practices.”

An April 18 internal Halliburton memorandum indicates that Halliburton again warned BP about its practices,
this time saying that a “severe” gas flow problem would occur if the casings were not centered more carefully.

Around that same time, a BP document shows, company officials chose a type of casing with a greater risk of
collapsing. ... ?pagewanted=1&sq=at_issue...

Mark Hafle, the BP drilling engineer who wrote plans for well casings and cement seals on the Deepwater
Horizon's well, testified that the well had lost thousands of barrels of mud at the bottom. But he said models
run onshore showed alterations to the cement program would resolve the issues, and when asked if a cement
failure allowed the well to "flow" gas and oil, he wouldn't capitulate.

Hafle said he made several changes to casing designs in the last few days before the well blew, including the
addition of the two casing liners that weren't part of the original well design because of problems where the
earthen sides of the well were "ballooning." He also worked with Halliburton engineers to design a plan for
sealing the well casings with cement. ... sf/2010/05/hearings_bp_ce...

graphic of fail
Casing joint

Kill may take until Christmas ... -gulf-of-mexico-oil-leak-...

BP Used Riskier Method to Seal Well Before Blast

BP memo test results ... 512/Internal.BP.Email.Reg...

Investigation results

The information from BP identifies several new warning signs of problems. According to BP there were three flow
indicators from the well before the explosion. ... 525/Memo.BP.Internal.Inve...

BP, what we know ... 00512/BP-What.We.Know.pdf

What could have happened

1. Before or during the cement job, an influx of hydrocarbon enters the wellbore.
2. Influx is circulated during cement job to wellhead and BOP.
3. 9-7/8” casing hanger packoff set and positively tested to 6500 psi.
4. After 16.5 hours waiting on cement, a negative test performed on wellbore below BOP.
(~ 1400 psi differential pressure on 9-7/8” casing hanger packoff and ~ 2350 psi on
double valve float collar)
5. Packoff leaks allowing hydrocarbon to enter wellbore below BOP. 1400 psi shut in
pressure observed on drill pipe (no flow or pressure observed on kill line)
6. Hydrocarbon below BOP is unknowingly circulated to surface while finishing displacing
the riser.
7. As hydrocarbon rises to surface, gas break out of solution further reduces hydrostatic
pressure in well. Well begin to flow, BOPs and Emergency Disconnect System (EDS)
activated but failed.
8. Packoff continues to leak allowing further influx from bottom.
Confidential ... 512/BP-What.Could.Have.Ha...

T/A daily log 4-20 ... 512/TRO-Daily.Drilling.Re...

Cement plug 12,150 ft SCMT logging tool
SCMT (Slim Cement Mapping Tool)
Schlumberger Partial CBL done. ... 0530/BP-HZN-CEC018441.pdf

Schlum CBL tools ... duct_sheets/well_integrit...

Major concerns, well control, bop test. ... 0530/BP-HZN-CEC018375.pdf

Energy & commerce links to docs. ... n=com_content&view=articl...

well head on sea floor ... %20prior%20to%20WHP002%20(2).jpg

Well head on deck of ship

BP's youtube propoganda page, a lot of rarely seen vids here....FWIW

Posted on: 2010/6/22 10:12

Re: Oil Spill in the Gulf.

2006/9/9 17:18
From lancaster county
Posts: 6621
He sounds legit and seems to know what he is talking about.

Either way this whole thing is a real mess

Posted on: 2010/6/22 11:10

Re: Oil Spill in the Gulf.

2008/10/25 14:19
From York County
Posts: 2142
I'm developing a migraine headache, not sure if it's this article or yesterdays coffee I drank to read it. I'm pretty sure it has something to do with a grim realization of the situation.

Posted on: 2010/6/22 11:50
~ Fly Fishing ~ Personal therapy on the water. Equipment and travel rates apply.

Re: Oil Spill in the Gulf.

2010/1/27 16:05
From cool, dark, damp crevices
Posts: 14
I wouldn't give TOO much credence to dougr...just yet. They're building a "worst case scenario," which is fine. I think most people would rather be over prepared than under prepared given the amount of damage this will do to some ecosystems, including human livelihoods. However, from what I've gleaned from TOD and other sites, we need a definitive answer regarding the pressure out of the BOP while taking into account a mile of sea water pressure working against the oil. *shrugs* I think most people, including myself, are at a loss. So many events and safety concerns have either been overlooked or disregarded in the creating of such a massive industry, that supports so many other industries.

Pointing fingers needs to go waaayyyyyy back to the root of the problem, safety versus profit. But with every corner #OOPS#ing about who's gonna pay for this and that, I'm more and more disappointed that every thing, including humans, has a price.

Honestly Osprey, I think if the military COULD do something, they would do something. I've seen the Russian videos where they've used nukes to stop/control an oil spill. Theoretically, it could work but I'm not up on all the geology under the who knows?

If it was my home...

Posted on: 2010/6/22 12:09

Re: Oil Spill in the Gulf.

2006/9/9 17:18
From lancaster county
Posts: 6621
wow go to that link and type...lake erie

Posted on: 2010/6/22 14:09

Re: Oil Spill in the Gulf.

2008/1/31 17:19
From Pretty much everywhere at some point, Thorndale today.
Posts: 14384
Jay, thanks for the link to that. I read it the other day too. I did not post because I don't know whether the guy is legit or not either, and I haven't had time to go over his analysis. But I have to say, his scenario explains a lot of things and makes a lot of sense. I'm sure its just an opinion, but it's a well-researched and logical one. Frankly that scenario seems like the most likely situation right now, which is very scary. It explains why plugging it was doomed to failure, and why they're trying to open up the pipe as much as possible and collect as much as possible.

If it's true that the pipe is damaged under the surface and collapsing the earthen substrate, then there is no stop to this until the oil is gone. The relief well will not work, and the hole will get much, much larger, and there's not much that can be done to stop it.

Nukes might be a serious consideration. Need a geologist to know whether it'd work or make things worse...

Posted on: 2010/6/22 15:52

Gee I feel better already...

2006/9/10 21:53
From Greensburg, PA
Posts: 13649
Tests show BP is on target for mid-August completion of a relief well in the Gulf of Mexico, the best hope of stopping the oil that's been gushing since April...

Posted on: 2010/6/25 13:26

Re: Oil Spill in the Gulf.

2007/1/2 11:55
From Bozeman
Posts: 19931
I'm hearing more and more corporate sponsored crazy from the right side of the aisle. Let's hope this ends soon, before it turns into a full blown political issue.

Sickening. I don't care who is to blame. Let's get it cleaned up.

Posted on: 2010/6/25 13:42

Re: Oil Spill in the Gulf.

2009/5/29 6:40
From harlansburg
Posts: 4578
I agree jayL, politics should have NOTHING to do with it. this is a crisis, time for people to put thier agendas on hold, work together, and get the damn job done. if they can't do that, then we need people that can.
we all need to keep all this in mind come election time, who actually did something and who simply wanted to point fingers.
a monkey can point his finger.

Posted on: 2010/6/25 16:41

Re: Oil Spill in the Gulf.

2006/9/10 21:53
From Greensburg, PA
Posts: 13649
And you guys laughed when you heard his name in this whole mess.

PORT FOURCHON, La. - Kevin Costner's company has sent an oil-skimming vessel to help clean some of the crude that has fouled the Gulf of Mexico.

The actor told workers and visitors Thursday who had come to see the latest in the fight against the oil spill that "the machine I once dreamed of is here to help you."

The Ella G, now one of the Vessels of Opportunity, was retrofitted to receive oil and water from the skimmer, separate the oil and place it in storage tanks, and return the cleaned water to the Gulf. It had once been an offshore supply barge.

The system was built in 10 days, and BP chief operating officer Doug Suttles says the system offers many advantages. He says it can remove more oil, stay at sea indefinitely, and skim in seas up to 10 feet. Most skimmers can't work in seas higher than 4 feet.

A service of YellowBrix, Inc. .

Posted on: 2010/7/11 21:31

Re: Oil Spill in the Gulf.

2008/1/31 17:19
From Pretty much everywhere at some point, Thorndale today.
Posts: 14384
I didn't laugh. I merely rebuffed whoever it was that said BP was holding it back. BP approved of the effort the day it was brought up.

As of June 10, there were 10 of them working in the gulf, which was all that were made at that time. These were smaller scale machines that were already operational. They worked, but had some clogging issues, and further, the ships they were on were only able to handle use in low seas.

So they sent in the big ship. It took a while to get there, and once there, 10 days to rig up. But its now operational, and thats what the new stories are about. Appears to work well, even in high seas!

Posted on: 2010/7/12 9:26

Re: Oil Spill in the Gulf.

2007/1/2 11:55
From Bozeman
Posts: 19931

It was a reference to the hilarious video that jake posted a while back. Their last resort was to call kevin costner.

Posted on: 2010/7/12 9:28

« 1 2 3 4 (5) 6 »

You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]

Site Content


Remember me

Lost Password?

Register now!
Stay Connected facebook instagram RSS Feed

What color woolly bugger is the most productive for you?
Black 40% (64)
White 12% (20)
Olive 31% (51)
Brown 3% (6)
Don't use them ever 6% (10)
Other color 5% (9)
The poll closed at 2015/5/14 7:05

Copyright 2015 by | Privacy Policy| Provided by Kile Media Group | Design by