Browsing this Thread:
1 Anonymous Users
|
|
Re: Another Didymo stream |
|
|---|---|---|
 
Joined:
2006/9/10 22:25 Posts: 0
 |
From what I have heard from guys who frequent the upper D and the W/E branches - where Didymo has been for a number of years(since 2007) - the fishing has been better than ever. It may look nasty and foul lines/flies/lures at peak growth times but I think overall trout pops will be fine. I have yet to read anything online about trout disappearing from any stream infected with it(knock wood).
And yes, I concur, kill birds starting with common mergansers who wander up nearly every trib. along the D.
Posted on: 2012/6/7 18:43
|
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
Re: Another Didymo stream |
|
|---|---|---|
 
Joined:
2006/9/21 0:02 From Pittsburgh
Posts: 503
|
FWIW -
I've been told by a couple of old timers on the delaware, that didymo has been in that river for a long time. It just recently has been identified and given a name. Don't know how much truth there is to those claims though
Posted on: 2012/6/10 20:37
|
|
|
|
||
| |
||
|
|
Re: Another Didymo stream |
|
|---|---|---|
Joined:
2009/2/10 16:30 From SE PA
Posts: 1711
|
Does the scientific community community have any idea how long it takes from the time of introduction until there is a sizable impact on a stream or river? I know this is a very open question but for instance, is there an estimate when Didymo was introduced into the Delaware? Was it a ten year process or twenty or fifty?
Posted on: 2012/6/12 13:30
|
|
|
|
||
| |
||
You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.
Montana Angler Fly Fishing
