Register now on PaFlyFish.com! Login
HOME FORUM BLOG PHOTOS LINKS


Sponsors

Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users





"Freshwater Fish Populations See Rapid Decline"

Joined:
2007/4/8 20:43
From SEPA
Posts: 19
Offline
Quote:
"People rarely appreciate the major impact that even a fairly moderate amount of fishing has on certain freshwater stocks," said Winemiller, who added that the loss of big predator species reverberates throughout the ecosystem. "The impact started very long ago."


http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2009/09 ... shwater-fish-decline.html

Posted on: 2009/9/2 13:17


Re: "Freshwater Fish Populations See Rapid Decline"
Moderator
Joined:
2006/9/9 9:29
From Monessen, PA
Posts: 1978
Offline
Quote:

The researchers didn't crunch numbers or analyze data.


Rather, they looked for historical references to fish populations in "newspaper articles, diaries and other historical records," relying on fish stories such as these:

"In 1620, Captain John Smith wrote that his crew... caught enough sturgeon, salmon, eels and other species in one night to fill 12 hogsheads."

and

"In Australia, likewise, explorers caught 200-pound cod and other huge fish on demand...."

Sounds like the talk around 1:00 AM at the Jamboree fire ring!

Posted on: 2009/9/2 13:28
_________________
Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace-- but there is no peace. The war is actually begun!... Our brethren are already in the field! It is in vain... to extenuate the matter...but as for me, Give Me Liberty or give me death.


Re: "Freshwater Fish Populations See Rapid Decline"

Joined:
2007/4/8 20:43
From SEPA
Posts: 19
Offline
I offered the article with no commentary...but yeah, the same train of thought stopped off in my head, too.

Posted on: 2009/9/2 13:39
_________________
April 8, 2007 - December 4, 2011.
And why not?


Re: "Freshwater Fish Populations See Rapid Decline"

Joined:
2008/6/25 9:41
From Pgh
Posts: 141
Offline
It was standard procedure to keep everything you caught. Even the early part of the 20th century, photographs of huge catches were standard. This kind of harvest had to have an huge negative effect on fish populations.

There were fewer people back then, but they had a huge harvest per person. Today, many more people, but fewer kept fish per person. Which is worse for fish pops... or are they about the same? It's a guessing game, but I firmly believe things are going downhill for freshwater fish populations.

Attach file:



jpg  Fish Slaughter 1.jpg (7.14 KB)
1677_4a9fecc12f130.jpg 128X87 px

jpg  fish slaughter 2.jpg (12.75 KB)
1677_4a9fecdbbdd89.jpg 150X122 px

jpg  fish slaughter 3.jpg (6.49 KB)
1677_4a9feced0c83e.jpg 123X77 px

Posted on: 2009/9/3 9:32
_________________
"I used to like fishing because I thought it had some larger significance. Now I like fishing because it's the one thing I can think of that probably doesn't." --John Gierach






You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]





Site Content
Login
Sponsors
Stay Connected

twitterfeed.com facebook instagram RSS Feed

USGS Water Levels
The New Keystone Fly Fishing Book
Polls
How many trout did you harvest in 2016
Zero, I am C&R all the way. 71% (173)
1-5 wild trout 2% (6)
1-5 stocked trout 14% (35)
6-10 wild trout 0% (2)
6-10 stocked trout 3% (8)
more than 10 wild trout 3% (9)
more than 10 stocked trout 4% (10)
_PL_TOTALVOTES
The poll closed at 2017/2/21 10:26
6 Comments





Copyright 2017 by PaFlyFish.com | Privacy Policy| Provided by Kile Media Group | Design by 7dana.com