Register now on! Login


Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users

10 ft 7wt

2010/2/3 8:56
From Palmer Twp
Posts: 1
Good day
I picked up a 10 ft 7 wt outfit at the fly-fishing show in summerset nj this past January.
What I would like to know is this overkill or should this work out ok for Bass / prickrel fishing. I have a few small lakes I can fish.
I was thinking that the longer length would help with the bigger deer hair bugs as well as big wooly buggers and the likes.
Any commits
Thank you

Posted on: 2010/8/2 9:36

Re: 10 ft 7wt
2006/9/13 12:42
From Altoona, PA
Posts: 16
I think it should work great. Let us know how you do.

One caution about a long rod. If you don't get a reel that balances that length, it can feel "tippy". That's to say, when you speed up and stop and the end of the backcast and forecast, the rod will pull in your hands.

And of course, you want to be careful to keep your cast from getting "wristy".

Posted on: 2010/8/3 6:40
Never challenge a cat to a staring contest

Re: 10 ft 7wt

2009/11/16 19:34
From Nazareth PA
Posts: 50
Great for steelhead too.

Posted on: 2010/8/3 8:24

" It has always been my private conviction that any man who puts his intelligence against a fish and loses has it coming"...John Steinbeck

Re: 10 ft 7wt
2006/9/9 17:32
From Gettysburg
Posts: 439
A long, 7WT rod is very versatile and will cover well most bass and pickeral situations. If you're not accustomed to long rods, be careful landing fish. With the extra length, it's tempting to try and swing the fish up out of the water to your hand. This is a very good way to bust a rod tip.
Your 7WT should see a lot of action across PA for a variety of fish.

Posted on: 2010/8/3 8:57

Re: 10 ft 7wt

2010/4/17 8:10
From Ransom, Pennsylvania
Posts: 2
though they are generally considered "steelhead" rods, I have an Orvis TLS 10' 7Wt I purchased specifically for fishing the Susky, as I'm a wading angler and need a little extra reach, but it's also become my choice for float-tubing in larger stillwaters for the same reason. they're a great all-around rod for big water when overhead clearance isn't an issue and where you'll need to make longer casts.

Posted on: 2010/8/10 20:46

Re: 10 ft 7wt

2007/4/8 20:43
Posts: 19
I bought an 11'3" 6wt switch with the intention of using it overhanded. I've used it extensively for bass in rivers and lakes and one outing to the surf.

Before that, I had a 10' 5wt I've used for trout and bass in streams, rivers, and lakes.

Posted on: 2010/8/10 22:12
April 8, 2007 - December 4, 2011.
And why not?

Re: 10 ft 7wt

2010/3/15 23:48
From Saxonburg
Posts: 0
Generally speaking, you will have more control over the line, and be able to cast further with a longer rod. The WT rating provides a guide for how heavy of a bug you can toss with the rod/line combo.

Of course, there are many factors that can a affect control and distance, but I've found the aforementioned concepts to be applicable to my circumstances.

Good choice on your rod!

Posted on: 2010/8/13 9:05

You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]

Site Content
Stay Connected facebook instagram RSS Feed

USGS Water Levels
The New Keystone Fly Fishing Book
Where do you most want to fly fish outside the region?
Western US 39% (31)
Alaska 10% (8)
New Zealand 32% (26)
Florida Keys 3% (3)
South America 6% (5)
Elsewhere 7% (6)
The poll closed at 2018/3/17 12:44

Copyright 2018 by | Privacy Policy| Provided by Kile Media Group | Design by